Friday, November 20, 2009

SR22 Test FLight: Wow!

(note, this is one from the archives, enjoy...)

Today will forever be considered a “milestone day” in the life of this aviator, as myself and one of my best buds in Eugene got to go flying. No news there, but...Oh wait…did I mention we were at the controls of our very own Cirrus SR22 GTS?

Truth be told, it was only ours for about an hour, and a demo pilot from Duluth was in the right seat making sure Matt Moberg and myself didn’t bend (snap?) any really expensive composite airplane materials.

A little background: From the very day I first laid eyes on a Cirrus SR20 years ago at an AOPA Expo, I knew this was THE plane. Something about the Cirrus leaps out at a pilot, grabs hold and refuses to let go. I’ve always been impressed by the Cirrus operation – how they seem to know what pilots want AND need. Maybe that explains why they are cranking out 60 units a month these days.
Maybe it’s the curves of the fuselage, or the way the airframe, ergonomically-perfect interior and avionics suite come together in a symphony of delight that a flyer rarely feels unless they are in the left seat of a true aviation masterpiece.
And now that I’ve actually FLOWN a Cirrus, it seems words cannot possibly do this airplane right, but I will try…

Fit and Finish: Matt flew the northbound demo leg from Eugene’s Mahlon Sweet Field to Corvallis Muni, so I was able to lounge in the back seat and take a good look at the way this plane is built. I shared the back seat with Matt’s wife Carol, and we both had plenty of elbow and knee room. The seats could have been right at home in a high-end Lexus, they were that comfortable. The ANR Bose headsets (not sure if those were standard or just the sets that the demo team used) made the ride as quiet as I have ever experienced, and with the four knot wind and clear and a million weather, being a passenger in a Cirrus was far superior to anything I have ever experienced in GA air travel.

The SR22 GTS just FEELS like a well-built product. Things fit together tight, the doors close solid, and you just know that in 20 years, this will still be an airframe that serves it’s owner well. But the back seat is not where the fun is in a Cirrus, so at CVO we switched places and after years of dreaming, I was finally in the left seat of an SR, with my left hand on the key and my right hand searching for the blue prop lever (there isn't one, propeller pitch is automatically controlled).

Start-up and takeoff: I’ll admit, I was a little apprehensive about actually FLYING the Cirrus…I thought that this might be a demo “ride” only. But our Cirrus pilot, Steve Noldin, basically gave me the plane. He said some planes have problems with “hot starts” but not Cirrus. The engine had only been off about 60 seconds, and all it took for me to coax it back to life – on my very first try ever in this make/model – was one-quarter throttle, full mixture, three blades and POW, three hundred and ten ponies instantly idling at 1,000 RPMs, ready to launch.

Takeoff was sweet. I did not know that the Cirrus family does not have a steerable nose wheel, and after lining up on the centerline, believe me, it was a rush to begin pushing the throttle forward. Like a fine sports car, the SR22 plants you in your seat with gobs of acceleration. But as IAS increased, I noticed we were only about 75% power, so I applied more forward throttle and the GTS leapt forward some more. Now rolling faster, I was STILL only at 85% power. This was mind-blowing. So to hell with it, I shoved it to the forward stops and the Cirrus sped up like a Nissan 300ZX to yet another level.

When those sleek wings decide to grab hold of the air, hang on, because the SR22 loves to fly. It didn’t explode into the sky uncontrollably, but instead was smooth and predictable – this is how an airplane is supposed to feel when it is rigged perfectly and the weight/balance is dead on.

The side stick: Of all the Cirrus features I’ve thought about over the years, the side stick topped the list. Would it be hard to learn? Would it be too sensitive…or not sensitive enough? Well, turns out the side stick is a non-issue…and by the time I was over the numbers at the departure end of the runway, I had already forgotten about the stick. This new-fangled style of controlling an airplane would forever be “the way” it should be done. Case closed.

Avionics: The FlightMax Entegra Primary Flight Display/Flight Director defies description. This panel could probably do your taxes while dragging your butt through the clouds and around thunderstorms as you follow a complex GPS approach inbound. I’m not going to go into long detail about what it does, but I’ll say this…maybe it was because I’ve got a few hours flying this type of PFD in X-Plane, but inside of :30 seconds as PIC, I was able to easily find IAS, altitude, RPMs, everything. Only thing that took a bit of searching for was the old yaw ball, which is now integrated into the PFD. And yes, I still have sloppy feet.

Returning to EUG, Steve let me work the plane through whatever maneuvers I choose. It took me zero minutes to be up to speed on the S-TEC/Meggit integrated autopilot, which is of the quality of what you might expect in a 757...not kidding here. The crisp handling coupled with a quick roll rate made air work nothing more than (a) think it, (b) twitch your wrist on the stick and (c) the airplane turns.

Because I seemed to be easily grasping how to control the Cirrus without really thinking about it, I was able to begin searching for targets on the TCAS – my first time ever with in-cockpit traffic awareness. And when Steve switched the right MFD to monitor the engine, the TCAS data was also shown redundantly on the bottom of the two GNS 430 GPS units. Sweet.

The landing: Entering the pattern, I began to think of a tactful way to let Steve know I was close to wussing out on trying to land an airplane valued well to the north of a quarter million dollars. But then as I descended into right downwind for 34R, I snapped back to reality when I noticed that the Cirrus was beginning to feel like an old pair of favorite gloves – it wrapped around my hands in a way that made controlling it completely intuitive. Yes, this airplane slings itself through the air at 160+ KIAS in cruise, but in the pattern, the SR22 was perfection as I brought the speed to the 100 KIAS mark easily and dropped a notch of flaps. Ninety on base, more flaps, and eighty on final…followed by (bragging here) a landing that felt like I had a thousand hours in the Cirrus…not 18 minutes. This is not because I am some kind of ace, but because this airplane does everything right. Everything.

Conclusion: I knew that flying a Cirrus would be wonderful, but I had no idea to what level of “wonderfulness” this airplane can achieve. After one quick leg, I felt confident that I could go out there right now, jump in the SR22 and make a smooth VFR flight anywhere. This is because Alan Klapmeier and his team of 970 seriously dedicated people have built an airplane that is so well-engineered, it is no wonder this company – and this airplane – are considered by many to be the benchmark for GA airplane manufacturing.

I have never flown a Columbia 400, or an A36 Bonanza, or the new Mooney Acclaim. But after flying a Cirrus SR22 GTS, there is no reason to test fly anything else. Every pilot deserves to own a really fast, beautiful airplane at least once in their lives. And after my demo flight today, you can bet your farm that the “N” number on my “forever” plane just might end with Charlie Delta and be constructed in a state that, um, isn't Kansas.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

My Dream Hangar, 2009 Edition

In the past few posts, I've published some great "Dream Hangar" lists from fans of this blog. Every one of these submitted lists has some sort of twist, some surprise that you didn't see coming. That, I believe, is what makes this exercise so enjoyable.

To close out Dream Hangar 2009, I offer my own list, with a few old favorites and a couple of new surprises. I offer this list in ascending order, with my favorite as #1:
(10) Pilatus PC-21 - No, the model number is not a typo. While everyone with a brain including me would love to have Pilatus' groovy cabin-class hauler, I want one of their fast, furious and fun fighters. O.K., maybe technically a trainer, but you can't dispute the fact that flying this much airplane would be like flying a fighter jet.

(9) Piaggio P180 - This twin turboprop pusher replaces the PC-12 on my list this year. Nothing against the aforementioned PC-12, but I have grown to love the Piaggio. Sure, maybe it DOES look like a chubby catfish, but it's a fast, efficient and quiet catfish. I think owning one of these would be like owning some exotic Italian sports car...no matter where you park it, there is never another one around.

(8) Diamond DA42NG Twinstar - The DA42NG is the hottest piston twin out there right now, and with the economics and speed it delivers with its two Austro Engine AE 300 turbocharged injected 2.0 liter diesel engines, I'll be ready for the day when biodiesel aviation fuels are commonplace. I continue to admire the complete Diamond line, and their sleek twin is a star in the sky.

(7) Addiston Pemberton's Boeing 40C - Gotta have one biplane, and this one is the best one in the country today in my opinion. Pemberton's 40C goes so far beyond a "restoration" job, it is more like a flying piece of perfect aviation art. But if I get this one, I think it'll be best to stay away from Canyonville, Ore.

(6) Air Force One - Not one person reading this blog wouldn't mind owning the baddest 747 on the planet. It's got a swank office, serious inflight connectivity, and all that great, um, secret electronic equipment. Go ahead, cut me off in the pattern, cropduster, you'll be vapor with the flick of a switch. First thing I'd do is throw all the press people off and invite all my Tweeples to fly with me in style. And besides, who doesn't like toilet paper emblazoned with the Presidential Seal?

(5) P-51 Mustang - Even Tom Cruise will tell you that flying a P-51 is like snorting testosterone. Fast, powerful, deadly, and it makes the perfect airplane noise when it flies. If only we could have made a modern day version...oh wait, we almost did...

(4) Piper PA-48 Enforcer - The baddest "Piper" ever built is a turboprop powered light close air support/ground-attack aircraft built by Piper Aircraft in 1971. Piper manufactured two Enforcers by heavily modifying two existing Mustang airframes and fitting them with Lycoming YT55-L-9A turboprop engines along with numerous other significant modifications. It cruised at 405 MPH and could climb at 5,000 FPM, but was never mass produced.

(3) HondaJet - Like Pemberton's 40C, some airplanes are works of art, and the HondaJet qualifies in this niche. Forget it's sexy lines and very respectable performance numbers, the fact that it's a quality HONDA product cannot be understated. Just go buy a Honda lawnmower and you'll know what I mean.

(2) Douglas DC-3/C-47 - There are many reasons this wonderful plane continues to tug at my aviator's heart. I'm not really sure why it does, it's not the fastest plane in the sky, and it costs plenty to keep one flying today. But if you believe like I do that airplanes have souls and personalities, you cannot find a more personable flying example of a Douglas DC-3/C-47 then Duggy, the "Smile in the Sky". If you look at Duggy and don't break out in a Cheshire Cat grin, brother, you are not an aviator, you're just a person with a pilot's license.

(1) Piper Cherokee 235 N8527W - Yes, we can dream all we want, play fun games making up lists. But my dream airplane resides right now in my hangar out at KEUG. All through my flying years, I have wanted a nice, low time cross country machine with good avionics. I set my bar on a Cessna 172, never thinking I'd one day own a Cherokee 235. So while I ponder what could be out there in Fantasyland, what is a reality NOW is Katy, my all-time favorite plane and part-time mechanical girlfriend. We can dream all we want, but face it, just look around and see what you have today, it really is quite remarkable.
There it is, my Dream Hangar for 2009. A few surprises? Perhaps. I'll be not everyone who reads this blog knew about the Piper Enforcer.

And now back to our regularly-scheduled programming...

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Sunday, November 15, 2009

Eclectic Extravagances or Practical Pondering?
More Dream Hangers from World of Flying Readers

Oh, baby, the hits just keep on coming! Just when I think I've seen the best Dream hangar submissions, more come in that makes me smile a bit wider. This has been a fun exercise in testing the imagination of my readers, and they have passed that test with Dream Hangar lists like these:

From reader Paul Tomblin:
Spitfire, either a V or something in the XX to XXV range
de Havilland Beaver on amphibious floats
Super Cub on tundra tires
PC-12
XB-70
Space Ship One
White Knight (do those two count as one?)
Some sort of moto-glider, maybe a Diamond?
L-39
The flying sub from Voyage To The Bottom Of The Sea
Or this jewel, which has a varied but super groovy assortment of toys and workhorses. It came in from Dean Siracusa who runs transtock.com, a very cool and elegant stock photo site focusing on transportation photos, offers a list that of course includes his current Meyers 200 (shown in photo at top):
Grumman Albatross
Helio Stallion (the larger, turbine version of the Helio Courier)
The Sea Fury known as Dreadnaught
Meyers OTW bi-plane
Gulfstream G-550
A-star helicopter
Boeing C-17
Icon A5
Marchetti SF-260
Aviat Husky A-1C
And the "Dream Hangar" according to Chris Simons:
Boeing Stearman
Extra 300s /W Thunderbolt engine
Turbine DC-3 in classic TWA colors
Cessna Mustang
Shorts Tucano MK1 in digital camo
Sukhoi SU-27 in Russian Knights colors
Piper J-3 Cub
Lockheed Fairchild C-123 /w JATO
New Cessna 182T turbo
One thing this "Dream Hangar" project has shown me is that each pilot has their own idea of what is cool in the sky. While some of these lists leaned heavily towards one area such as military or vintage planes, the constant has been that each list has at least one toy (like Simons' Sukhoi SU-27) or one bizjet grande (like Siracusa's G-550) or one really out there entry such as Tomblin's "flying sub from Voyage To The Bottom Of The Sea".

I will be writing my list soon.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Thursday, November 12, 2009

One Reader's "Lottery Fleet"

World of Flying Reader Kent Shook sent in a Dream Hangar list so elaborate, I'm choosing to present it here verbatim. This list really exemplifies the kind of dreaming we all do. And he scored double points with me by having the HondaJet on the list! Enjoy:
10) HondaJet, assuming it actually comes to market. I love to travel, and I love to fly, but there are times where it really is the destination and not the journey that are important - That's why GA pilots, even those who own planes, still travel on the airlines sometimes. I hate the airlines, so I'd want my own jet - But I'm also a big fan of efficient planes. From where I live, the farthest point in the continental US is about 1800nm away; The HondaJet can go anywhere within with one fuel stop and 4.5 flight time, so call it 5.5 hours (or 5 with a quick turn) to go anywhere in the US. Compare the amount of time used vs. fuel burn to a Citation X, and for a ConUS trip I'd be taking 2.5 hours more but burning well under half the amount of fuel.

9) Piper Turbo Twin Comanche (or, if such a beast were ever to come out, a Diamond "DA52 Super TwinStar"). The "Twinkie" is also a "go-places" airplane, but less than half the HondaJet's speed. However, for trips that don't require the speed of a jet, the Twinkie is hard to beat for efficiency at a reasonably fast speed. It'll also allow me to fly to destinations with shorter and/or unpaved runways. In reality, this is one of the planes I would most like to own.

8) P-51 Mustang - There's just something about the P-51 that makes any living, breathing human take notice. It's fast, it's loud, and it helped win WWII and establish the US as a world superpower. Plus, these birds NEED the folks with unlimited funds to keep them flying!

7) Husky A1C - While there are a lot of folks who have a soft spot for the Piper Cub, the Husky (an improved derivative of the Super Cub) has the extra performance to fly in and out of backcountry mountain airstrips, pull floats out of the water, and have an improved fun factor. The controls on the 2005 and later Huskies have been modified so that they are extremely well-harmonized, making this a VERY fun airplane.

6) Extra 300L - Aerobatic hotshot machine with an extra seat so I can turn my friends upside down too.

5) Globe Swift - One of the neatest vintage airplanes IMHO. I'd go for the "Super Swift" modded variety with sticks and a 210hp Continental IO-360 engine for extra fun. This one is also on my real-life buy-someday list, as it can be used for traveling (and it's efficient), it can be used for light aerobatics, and you can fly it with the windows open. :-)

4) DC-3/C-47 - Another one that's probably on every pilot's list to at least fly on someday - It both helped win the war and it was also the first commercially viable airliner.

3) Seawind 300C, again assuming it gets certified. One of the fastest planes that can be landed on water, with a massive cabin and cargo compartment for taking your buddies on that remote fishing vacation, or hauling your family to the cabin on the lake for the weekend.

2) F/A 18F Super Hornet - For when you just feel the need to be a bad-ass and make a lot of money into a lot of noise and go REALLY fast. :-D

1) Cessna 185 - I have a lot of my time in a 182, and it is one of the best airplanes ever produced - While it's not the best at any one thing, it's pretty darn good at EVERYTHING. The 185's extra power and tailwheel configuration would allow for a little better performance at backcountry strips or off water on floats.

I'd have skis and floats for the Husky and the 185, and maybe even the DC-3/C-47. Just because. ;-)

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Monday, November 09, 2009

Just Give Every Pilot a DC-3
and We'll All Be Good To Go!

Go ahead, ask thy Twitterverse, and thy Twitterverse manifests in the affirmative.

That's what happened on Monday when I put the word out on the "street" to get some of my Tweeples to send me their "Dream Hangar" lists.

I have published my own "Dream Hangar" list each year that I've had this blog, but this year I thought that in the interest of promoting a more socially aware world, I would let the readers take over the blog and publish their top 10 lists. Most of these show the writer's favorite plane as the #1 position, however a few could not, repeat NOT, pin down a favorite.

So, without a drum roll, here are some of the best submissions:
From Mikel, a.k.a Laura Mikel Fitterman, a commercial pilot based in FL who Tweets as @mickyl, we have this great list:

AT-6 Texan
Piper L4
P-51D (of course)
Lockheed Super Constellation
Cessna 402
Stinson L5
Cessna 195
T-34
Cessna T-37
DC-3
Then there's David M. Vanderhoof's list. He's with Airplanegeeks and is Plane Crazy Down Under's Historian in Residence

BF-109E-4
BD-5J
F-117A Stealth
YB-49 Flying Wing
Citation X
KC-130F Hercules - Blue Angels' "FAT ALBERT"!!
DC-3 In Eastern Airlines markings
Lockheed 1049 Connie TWA Markings
707-320 In PAN AM Markings
T-33A Shooting Star

Paul Pilipshen's list is one heavy on military hardware, until you get to the top, when Paul wants to go have some fun upside down:

Pitts S-2C
Pitts S-1-11B
F4U Corsair
B-25 Mitchell
PBY Catalina
P-38 Lightning
F8F Bearcat
B-29 Superfortress
F-82 Twin Mustang
F4 Phantom

Adam Fast, who is known in Twitterland as @adamcanfly and offers "Regularly Scheduled Geekery" at adamfast.com, says he actually keeps a spreadsheet for that special day when his lottery numbers hit:

SR22
Stearman
Quest Kodiak
Texas Sport Cub
Extra 330L
P-51
DC-3
Helio Courier
RV of some kind
Concorde (hey, you said UNLIMITED)

Grant McHerron who is @falcon124 in Twitter sent this great list, and was the only one with a rotorwing in the Dream Hangar:

Antillies Turbo Goose
Yak-52TW
DC-3
Cessna Mustang
T-38 Talon
MD-500 Helicopter
Boeing BBJ
Income T65 X-Wing
Boeing Stearman
Two-seat sail plane (ike a modern version of the Blanik)

And there's this Dream Hanger from Jeremy Martin, Class of 2010, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology:

Beechcraft model 2000 StarShip
BAC/Aerospatiale Concorde
North American P51d Mustang
Lancair IV-P
Sukhoi su26m
Terrafugia Transition
Lockheed L-049 Constellation
Rockwell STS Orbiter (Space Shuttle)
Airbus A380, configured as luxury executive transport
Antonov AN-225
And Yes, I AM glad this MIT student added the Terrafugia Transition to his list. Would have been brutal had he left that off.

Next up, I will highlight a very detailed list sent in from Kent Shook, what he calls his "Lottery Fleet". It's a great read. Finally, in part three, I'll present my Dream Hanger for 2009.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Submit your Top 10 Airplanes for
Dream Hangar 2009!

Each year since starting this blog about 850 posts ago, I have written a "Dream Hangar" post...what would be in my stable if money were not a consideration.

This has always been one of my favorite annual writing assignments, but also one of the toughest, since it is damned hard to select ONLY 10 airplanes for my Dream Hanger.

But why should I have all the fun:
This year, I am opening it up to my readers and asking for submissions about what would be in your Dream Hangar if you could have any 10 flying machines. These can be great airplanes from aviation history, airliners, spacecraft, current GA rides, or even fantasy planes. In this Dream hangar writing assignment, there are no rules. Remember, you have endless money, so you can have them all. But I also like to force an aviator to pick just one favorite as #1 because this is always such a challenge.
O.K., you have your assignment. Please list your "Top 10" airplanes in ascending order, so that #1 is your favorite "gotta have it" ship. I've already got a few submissions through my 1,016 Twitter followers, and it is interesting that the one plane on several of the lists submitted this morning is the DC-3. Certainly would be on my list.

Please email your submissions to me here, or use the yellow "Send me Feedback" button at upper right.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Thursday, November 05, 2009

NORDO: New Data on NW188 Reveals
More Questions That Must be Answered

There is so much that does not add up with the bizarro flight of Northwest 188, nobody analyzing this mess knows quite where to start. For those of you that are just emerging from underneath the dark side of a rock, here is the nuts and bolts, with info gleened from the official FAA "Emergency Order of Revocation" letter [pdf here] issued to the flight's two pilots:
On 21, October, 2009, NW188 departed SAN on a non-stop to Minneapolis, MSP. At 7:24P, Denver hands off the flight to Minneapolis Center, but at this point the flight drops off grid and goes NORDO. Minneapolis and Denver Centers continue to try and raise the flight, and Northwest Airlines dispatch goes postal trying without success raising the flight by company radio. About 8P, NW188 slides over the top of MSP at FL370, fat, dumb and happy. About 14 minutes later, the pilots finally plug back in and report they were over Eau Claire, WI, and "got distracted." The flight finally makes MSP and as a result of breaking Sections 91.13(a), 91.123 (a), 91.123 (b) and 91.135 (b), the pilots have been ordered by FAA to surrender their licenses immediately or risk civil penalties of $1,100 a day.
Now along with the obvious questions of what went so terribly wrong on the flight deck of NW188, each pilot I know wants to find out why NORAD's fighters weren't scrambled with the flight being radio silent for 91 minutes. Doesn't anyone remember what happened to this country on 9/11 of 2001? It seems unimaginable that an airliner full of souls could be allowed to wallow through the skies unescorted, with no radio contact.

But in researching this post, I came upon some super-secret NAV data that has yet to be published anywhere. To get this information, I had to leave an envelope of used, unmarked Monopoly money taped underneath a dumpster outside an unnamed ARTCC facility.

The graphic at the top of this post shows the actual Flightaware.com flight path of NW188, with my super-secret NAV data overlaid over the top. A close look at this NAV data reveals a long list of missed fixes that should have informed the pilots they were in the deepest of doo-doo. Let's analyze the data:
NW188 lost radio contact just west of HUHHH, and flew a direct course to OOPSI. The flight continued on what appears to be a 070 heading until OSHIT intersection when the pilots realized they were in serious violation of just about every FAR every published. After regaining contact with ATC, they begin a 270 degree right turn over DUHHH, ending their turn at WTFFF. They realize they are now pointed at Santa's house, and crank a hard left turn so they at least look like they are trying to hit MSP this time. They now head sort of west on a 260 heading to JEEZE when they come to the realization that they again have shot past MSP. They aim the pointy end of their A320 on about a 170 heading back in the general direction of MSP, and again overshoot the field until over OHELL. They finally aim NW188 back north and at 854P make a safe landing at MSP, about 67 minutes late.
Of course, this "scenic routing" most likely came from ATC, and not from the wayward pilots trying to really find MSP. We know this because after they checked back in with ATC and after realizing the severity of their error-filled excursion, you can bet they were following ATC direction to the letter. Regardless of how they got to MSP, they did eventually get there.

Two things could have happened that didn't: (1) The flight could have ran out of fuel and had to be ditched in someone's corn field, with the risk of major loss of life. This had to be a possibility since these two pilots were missing all the bells, whistles, annunciators, flashing lights and radio calls, so it makes perfect sense they were also not managing their fuel. Or (2) NORAD – after 91 minutes of radio silence – finally wakes up and scrambles their welcoming party. And what if the pilots were sitting cross-legged on the floor of the flight deck "on their laptops", and didn't see those important light gun signals? After so much radio silence, the possibility had to exist that air-to-air missiles would have ended this flight before it ended itself in another terrorist attack.

And finally, what would have happened had Northwest 188 encountered another craft that was also not in communication with ATC? What if they were flailing along at FL370 and came across Balloon Boy, up there in the flight levels setting a new altitude record in the Heene family's ridiculous, homebuilt spacecraft?

Yes, this has been a really weird period in U.S. aviation. What else could possibly happen in our skies that is as strange as these two incidents? We should be careful tempting the Gods with that question.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Monday, November 02, 2009

Biplane Artisans Never Get the Full
Credit They Truly Deserve!

Back in “the day”, we owned a small but very active art gallery, and I came to admire the artisans who displayed and sold their work in my shop. These painters, sculptors and potters never ceased to amaze me in their never-ending quest for perfection.

So what does that have to do with airplanes? Stay with me now…

In my life, I have had the distinct honor to know one of the finest biplane artists in this country by the name of Bob Lock. I say “biplane artists” because Lock (nobody calls him Bob) is one of a tiny group of Master Craftsmen who possess the skill set to bring those wonderful vintage biplanes literally back from the dead.

A few years ago at the American Waco Club banquet in Oshkosh, Lock was awarded the Charles Taylor Mechanic award from the FAA for spending the past 50 years as an aircraft mechanic. This is a well-deserved award, and it only goes to the very top hands in the trade.

I will never forget one day I spent in Lock’s Reedley, CA shop, watching him hand-form wing ribs for his New Standard D25 using tiny strips of wood, some screws and glue. Watching his hands work the wood into shape, I knew I was in the presence of an legend. Not just kissing Lock’s butt here either, these guys are un-freakin-believable to watch.

A couple of years ago, I discovered a group of equally talented biplane artists up in Spokane, WA. The two hangars of Pemberton and Sons at Felts Field are stuffed with hand-built biplanes, each of museum quality. But they have one project going up there that us worthy of note. They were resurrecting a Boeing B40-C from a serious basket case into a flying work of aviation art.

The Pemberton web site tells a wonderful story of the Canyonville Mail Plane Crash of October 2, 1928. On that day, pilot Grant Donaldson was trying to “make the mail” southbound between Portland and San Francisco when…
The decision was made. He entered Canyon Creek Canyon at the Pass, flying the big biplane in the narrow space between the treetops below, and the low clouds and fog above. As he flew down the canyon, he looked downward from his open cockpit to keep Pacific Highway in sight. As he approached the Pioneer Bridge, two and a half miles from the Pass, it happened.
If you love the stories of these old biplanes, make some quality time soon to visit the Pemberton site where you can download a PDF version of the Canyonville crash and view numerous vintage photos of the B40-C they are restoring. There is also a great photo gallery of their progress.

In writing this post, I must admit to becoming a bit nostalgic. When guys like Lock and the Pembertons go off to fly with Lindbergh, who will be the young men and women that will continue the astonishing work of these true American aviation heroes?

With that in mind, cherish any moment you can spend next to, near, or especially IN, one of these beautiful vintage biplanes. And the next time you meet up with anyone who can build a perfect biplane from a scrap heap of twisted parts, better shake their hand and tell them thanks, ‘cause they’ve damned well deserved it.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Sunday, November 01, 2009

America Can Still be Attracted to Three-Eight Charlie Despite the Box Office of "Amelia"

Regular readers of this blog know I have been pounding the pavement for nine years trying to get Hollywood and the world to notice the huge, monolithic, gargantuan accomplishments of Jerrie Mock, the first woman to fly solo around the world. I've hit plenty of dead ends in this quest, but I have never quit believing in this story and my screenplay about her life and 1964 flight.

In writing the script for "Three-Eight Charlie", I have produced each and every second of this film in my head, right down to the tiny details, including the soundtrack. Yes, the story about Jerrie's flight is based on her 1970 book, but my screenplay came completely out of the creative half of my brain. And because I have "watched" this film one million times at the little Cineplex in my head (always with free popcorn), I can assure anyone reading this post that it is a action-packed, heartfelt and accurate portrayal of Jerrie and her flight.

So being one of the very few people in a position to have an enormous amount of intimate knowledge of Mock's journey, it was with great anticipation that I awaited the release of "Amelia". The film stars Hilary Swank, who should be box office gold in any film. She is a very talented, very capable "A-list" actor, and while I have not seen "Amelia" yet, everything I have read says she pulled off the role well.

I had hoped for a blockbuster opening weekend for "Amelia", so that Hollywood would begin beating my door down for a follow-up story about another soon-to-be-famous female aviator. Yes, I wanted huge box office numbers for "Amelia" to prove that America is interested in strong female protagonists that can fly airplanes. But as Patrick Goldstein of the Los Angeles Times reports, despite a great cast, the movie just flat tanked in its opening:
"I know that all of America was queasily captivated by the bizarre "is it real or isn't it?" Balloon Boy escapade. But here in Hollywood, heads are being scratched over an equally puzzling mystery: How did Fox Searchlight, which has easily the best box-office batting average of any specialty film company in the business, get stuck with a turkey like "Amelia," which earned a disappointing $4 million box office at the film's weekend?"
With a reported $40 million production budget, getting only 10% of that back on opening weekend is pretty sad. As this post is written, the film has been showing for 10 days, and as of 10/30/2009, the film's total reported gross has grown to only $8.3 million.

This lousy showing at the box office can be dissected many ways, but one constant in that dissection seems clear: Reviews of the film have been pretty harsh across the board, with the lone positive review I could find complimenting Swank's portrayal of Earhart as generally believable while tearing down the film as a whole. Which leads me back to "Three-Eight Charlie":
I still believe that the story of Jerrie Mock's success as a aviator in her 1964 flight around the world will come completely out of left field and will be well-received by the public. It will be the fact that she is completely unknown that will pique the ticket buyer's interest - they will HAVE to learn more. Jerrie's story will be one not just about a pilot and her plane, but about a woman's determination to achieve what most said was unachievable.
I have read a few random articles stating that "Amelia" director Mira Nair ran into a very large number of creative hurdles as the film was pushing past green light into developing and on to shooting – that there were too many "creative voices" on the project. If these rumors prove to be true, we may never know what kind of film "Amelia" would have been, and how that film would have been reviewed.

This whole episode teaches me one thing: I have always known that the Hollywood studio system can be brutal when it comes to bureaucracy and can be where good screenwriting and production ideas go to die. I have also always fully expected a major studio to take my screenplay - and Jerrie's story - and re-write it so much, it becomes something else that does not do Jerrie or her accomplishment justice.
My promise to Jerrie Mock when we signed our Life Story Rights Agreement was that I was the one screenwriter on this planet who could look out for her best interests as "Three-Eight Charlie" was being made. But after watching "Amelia" come to market as a pretty "Big Studio" picture that is getting terrible reviews, I know now that the only way to make "Charlie" correctly is to pursue the project as an independent film. It is critical to this creative process that I stay in control to insure the audience that there won't be any bikini scenes, car chases, fighter jet attacks, exploding pyramids or camel races.
Just look at "Paranormal Activity", in theaters for just over a month. With a limited release and a production budget of $15,000 (yes, that IS fifteen thousand dollars, no zeros missing), this film has cashed in big with a total US Gross of $84.7 million. This proves to me that a film does not have to go the traditional big-budget, huge crew, buried-in-quagmire studio production route to make money. Umm, yes, we'll need a tad more than fifteen large to pull this Jerrie Mock flick off, but I'm prepared to sit around and wait for the Universe to put this project together for me.

And when my Prius Stretch Limo – powered by algae-based biofuel of course – pulls up to that red carpet for the world premiere of "Three-Eight Charlie", and when that first opening scene appears and I see a theater full of young future pilots smile as their love affair with aviation begins, every second and dollar I have spent in this quest will be worth it.

Big time.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

The Magic of Flight:
Why Your Plane is Sometimes Called a "Bird"

[This is a reprise of a previously-published post,
just because I like it - dan]

From the first few days when humans watched birds fly, we have been in awe of their beauty and functionality. With effortless ease, they take a few steps, flap their mighty wings, and launch skyward in a full STOL takeoff that would make a Maule seem like a DC-10 cargo ship trying to plunder its way into the sky.

I spent a weekend in 2007 over on the Oregon coast at Lincoln City, which at the time was getting pounded with gusts to 60 mph on it's way to a walloping with winds as high as 129 mph at Bay City. But while the wind was blowing, I came across a huge parking lot full of seagulls that were having a ball in those gusts:
One by one, the gulls would just flap their wings, propelling them up gracefully into the wind. At about three feet over my head, they would just hover, not flapping their wings, but letting the wind provide all the lift they needed to stay basically in one place. After that gull was done with his/her kite imitation, another would launch up into the gusts coming off the beach and play the hover game.
I had my newest camera with me, a Canon 40D, with a 200mm prime Canon "L" lens out front. With the drive set to max of about six frames per second, and the autofocus set to continuous (a sports mode), I was able to run all over the lot, chasing hovering seagulls. About 458 images later, I came back to my hotel and discovered some amazing things about birds. These mega-closeups of gulls in hover mode showed me the anatomy of a bird like I had never seen. If you refer to the photo at the top of this post, you will see the following five things:
1. The trailing edge of the gull's wing stretches out substantially to form a very large "flap" which provides additional lift for slow flight. This was confirmed on other shots of the gulls in fast flight, when these "flap" feathers were retracted.

2. Complimenting the "flaps" are what appear to be "spoilers" on the wing's leading edge. When you study the complete design of this gull's wing, it resembles a jetliner's wing in its "dirty" landing configuration. I find the gull's wings to be stunning works of art.

3. In slow flight, the gulls would flare their tail feathers wide, to create a sort of "horizontal stabilizer" to give the southbound end of the northbound bird extra lift. In close with my telephoto lens, I was amazed watching them steer by flexing these aft feathers ever so slightly, just enough to keep their beak aimed directly into the wind.

4. In hovering mode, the gulls would drop their retractable "gear" to help steer and stabilize their fuselage. As the gusts increased, the "gear" would come down to dirty up their airframe...and when the speed of the gusts dropped, the gull would retract their feet to clean up and eliminate any excess drag. Amazing.

5. The gulls kept their aerodynamic beak aimed PRECISELY into the wind. They would hint at their next movement ever so slightly when they would aim that beak left or right just before peeling off in either direction to pull out of the hover.
After a few seconds of hovering, each gull would crank into a hard left or right one-eighty, suck in their flaps and spoilers, yank up those retractable feet, and blast off downwind, picking up speed like they were shot from a cannon. All the time, I imagine they were smiling.

I have never studied birds up close like this, in their element. This seashore parking lot was like a little avian GA airport, the kind where a bunch of guys and gals in cloth airplanes have a ball playing together with the wind. I believe I might have seen a few of the seagulls grilling Brats, while others were drinking Budweisers during a heated discussion about whether it's best to run lean or rich of...beak.

When you really look at birds up close in stop-action, they do have many similarities to the flying machines we fly. They have wings, we have wings. They have a tail, we have a tail. They have a beak, we have GPS.

We win.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Sunday, October 25, 2009

Aviation Weather on the iPhone:
Tired of Waiting, I'm Moving On

For the last two years, I have been using Digital Cyclone's Pilot My-Cast on my stupid little Samsung U740 phone. While the phone was kind of a joke, the program was just what I needed. Pilot My-Cast served me well, never crashed, and at $10 a month, was a pretty decent deal. I was really glad on many, many trips to have real aviation weather in my pocket.

But on 11.04.09, my Verizon contract was going to expire, and it was time to reconsider my options for pocket aviation weather intelligence. See, my wife Julie was the iPhone user in the family, and had given me signals that she wanted to move up to a new 3Gs phone. That meant, her first-gen iPhone was up for adoption. And since I have been craving the whiz and bang of that stellar product, a deal was struck to get us on an AT&T Family Plan, moving her into the new 3Gs and me into her legacy iPhone. Only one thing was left to sort out:
Back at Oshkosh in late July, I had a long list of things to see and people to talk to. One of the first things on that list was to stop at the Pilot My-Cast booth and get the real story of when their app would be ready for the iPhone. While the rep at the booth was very gracious and even gave me a pretty cool free hat, they were as vague as can be about a release date. "Get on the email notification list" was about all I could get out of anyone there. So as my Verizon contract came to a close, I noticed on the My-Cast site that their iPhone release has been pushed from "fall" to "later this quarter". So I did what I had to do, got the iPhone and immediately installed Foreflight Mobile, version 2.4.1.
This decision is not at all based on the My-Cast app itself. I am sure that when it finally hits the Apple Store, it will be a polished, mature app just like their other versions are for various other phones. But I simply got tired of waiting, and man, am I glad I did:
Foreflight Mobile is about as sweet as you get. It has been designed from the ground up by aviators, actual pilots who use aviation weather every day. Because Tyson Weihs and the rest of the Foreflight team are pilots, they understand how this kind of app needs to work. This is not a bunch of guys laid off from Circuit City slopping together some crap in a basement, no, this is a nearly perfect and very functional app that delivers everything a pilot needs to get the "pre-flight intelligence" required to make better weather decisions.
Of course, I always recommend getting a phone weather briefing if you plan to fly IFR in actual IMC. And, there is a grand amount of WX products available on the Internets. But when you are out there on the ramp about to depart, Foreflight allows one last quick look at everything from the big picture to the intimate details about your destination FBO. After a couple of weeks using the app, I still cannot find anything deficient in its operation. Sure, people can get all nit picky with anything, but I challenge anyone who gives Foreflight a serious workout to find an area in which it still needs massive improvement.

Maybe this quick admiration for Foreflight comes from my quick admiration for the iPhone in general. Yes, I KNOW I'm coming late to this party, but, damn, this little sucker does everything you need a communications device to do. The ability to handle email, send and receive Tweets, surf the web, pull down accurate NOAA aviation weather and locate the nearest Geocaches is only upstaged by this:
Not going to mince words here, the very dependable Toyota pick-up that I drive is sadly either "Plain Jane" or "box stock", take your pick. For some reason, I have never upgraded the old school cassette deck, and so I usually drive around listening to NPR. But this weekend I bought the little adapter that allows the use of 3.5mm earphone jacks in the iPhone's ridiculous odd-sized earphone jack. On the way home from 'The Shack, I dug my old cassette adapter out of my glove box, slipped the faux cassette into the deck, and plugged this into the iPhone. I cranked up the built-in iPod on the phone, and discovered that the sound quality and power of the iPhone's iPod is way WAY better than my old iPod, which sounded tinny and crappy when played through the old deck. No, this phone was driving my speakers so well, I cruised home slowly, smiling as I wondered just what the hell this phone could NOT do.
So before you do anything else to get aviation weather on your iPhone, pony up the seventy five clams and get Foreflight. I promise you will love it, I know I do. And if the $74.99 price seems high for an iPhone app, consider that price against the $120/year subscription that one must pay for Pilot My-Cast. Next year, it's another $120, and the year after that, yep, $120. This makes the one-time-only price for Foreflight seem like an exceptional value.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Garmin's New Touchscreen Panel Confirms it:
I am a Dinosaur

There can be no disputing the fact that avionics has been in a state of flux for a number of years, a forward push towards better technology that vastly improves safety and situational awareness. As the days click off this thing we call life, we watch as each new week brings us something for our panels with more whiz and bang than the stuff that was debuted last week.

After the engine, the avionics is easily the most critical part of your flying machine. But in just my 13 years as a licensed pilot, the evolution of avionics has been dramatic:
I have flown planes with Loran, and that distant cousin of GPS kept me out of trouble. I have flown planes with ADF, but that was in my primary training when it was just a puzzling and odd contraption taking up space on the panel. Of course everything I have ever flown had VORs, and I seem to collect older GPS units that can no longer be updated. Today's panel looks nothing like those back in 1996 when I got my license, and even my current ride – a 1964 Piper Cherokee 235B – has more "steam gauges" than the trains that used to visit Petticoat Junction. But in this pilot's flying "career", one thing is constant. I have never touched a glass panel or any GPS aviation product made by Garmin. Despite this, I somehow fly my certified IFR bird around in and out of the clouds perfectly legal, and so far have always got where I was intending to go.
Full disclosure: I did fly a demo flight in a Cirrus SR22 once from Corvallis, Ore. back to Eugene, but my hands were busy caressing the supple leather of the side stick and throttle, and the demo pilot was the button pusher for all the shiny objects and glass gizmos before my eyes. But this week's news that Garmin has released what I believe is the most beautiful panel ever conceived is really shaking up the industry. AOPA has the details:
"If you’re a light-jet pilot you’re very lucky, because Garmin just introduced the first touch-screen glass cockpit for Part 23 light turbine aircraft. You’ll have far fewer knobs to remember when using the G3000 system. There remain soft keys, buttons that are relabeled to fit the task at hand. iPhone users will feel right at home. The console-mounted touch screens control radio management, audio management, flight management, weather systems management, synoptics, and other vehicle systems. The simplistic user interface leverages the experience Garmin has gained by designing and delivering millions of automotive consumer products. As with the G1000, the G3000 has full reversionary capabilities, including in-flight dynamic restarts, so that all flight critical data can be transferred seamlessly to a single display for added safety during flight. Garmin expects to receive G3000 technical standard orders (TSO) certification in the second half of 2011."
There is just something about this new panel that screams "game changer!" As I sit drooling on my keyboard gazing up at my new desktop image of the G3000, it makes me realize that not only have I never flown a glass cockpit airplane, now the avionics world is literally passing me right by as if I were tethered to the tarmac with tiedown chains:
It was bad enough when the Garmin 430s came out way back when and I could not afford them. Then Garmin upped the ante with the 530, and after that, added WAAS versions of each. I watched from the sidelines as Avidyne kept bringing bigger and badder panels to the avionics dogfight, and I was speechless as the G1000 panels arrived. So now, without ever even touching any of these "boxes", Garmin has added insult to injury with the G3000. I feel like a relic, yes, like a dinosaur, old and out of touch in the avionics race as I languish in the back of the pack behind my non-standard configuration of steam gauges.
As I write this, the annual NBAA convention and shopping spree is under way in Orlando, and of course that means just like Oshkosh, 'tis the season for gigantic news releases about the aviation industry. Today's big news was that both the PiperJet and HondaJet will have the G3000 panel, which will cause a major dilemma for pilots like myself:
I have been in love (lust?) with the HondaJet since I first saw it in person at Airventure a few years back. But this year, I watch the PiperJet fly at Oshkosh, and it dazzled with its quiet noise shadow and ridiculous slow flight performance. So now that I peer out into the ocean of life through a long telescope and watch as my ship slowly comes in, I must now decide which of these TWO dream airplanes is...the one. And with the news that they both will have G3000 panels when they hit the showroom floor, I just have to ask...
Would it be all right if I have them both?

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Balloon Boy Mania: Media Gets Punk'd While
Boy All But Admits Hoax on CNN

I am not lying when I say I awoke Thursday morning feeling like something weird or bizarro was going to happen. Not necessarily something bad, just something weird. And Jeez Louise, did that premonition come true:
If you were near a TV or on Twitter this morning, new broke after 11A that six-year-old Falcon Heene was trapped inside a homemade hot air balloon floating at altitudes up to 15,000MSL over the flatlands of Eastern Colarado. The family was constructing the fake UFO in the back yard of their suburban Fort Collins, CO. home, and Falcon's brother swore he saw Falcon get into the balloon and depart the backyard airport. The family reportedly called a local TV station begging for their news chopper to be launched in search of the boy, and as fast as digital news travels these days, in minutes the story was wall-to-wall, non-stop coverage on every cable news station.
As this drama unfolded in streaming video on my desktop, it soon became the most intense thing I have watched in years. A little boy floating in a very odd spaceship/balloon that was listing and spinning at altitude was mesmerizing, one could not help to think this might end badly. Twitter exploded with traffic, and the cable news people were stroking out trying to find out what the hell was going on with this increasingly strange story.

We all gasped as the now-deflating craft gently floated back to Earth in a freshly-plowed field. As first responders opened the door, we were all wondering if they were going to pull a lifeless body out. But the craft was...empty.

From the second the word got out officially that the boy was not in the craft when it landed, people started talking hoax. History on the family is that they were recently on the reality show "Wife Swap", about the most dysfunctional example of worthless television we have these days. Further, the dad has been featured on various Storm Chaser TV programs. That, coupled with the fact that THEY HAD AN INFLATED FAKE UFO BALLOON IN THEIR BACKYARD certainly raised lots of red flags.

But before anyone could confirm this was a hoax, the story quickly spread that there might have been some sort of basket underneath that the boy might have been in, and that news sparked a massive ground search for the boy and the basket. As this was unfolding, news came that, guess what, the boy was in fact hiding in a box in the garage attic, safe and sound.

When this news broke, again, many screamed hoax or publicity stunt. But, maybe the boy accidentally let the balloon go and was hiding in fear of being in trouble. Until that riddle was solved, the hoax storyline could not be "officially" published.

But late this afternoon, a youtube video raced through the Web that seems to confirm that this could have been a really poorly implemented stunt:
In this video, CNN's Wolf Blitzer is interviewing the family, and asks why Falcon didn't come out when he heard his name being called. In a small, kind of scared six-year-old voice, he is heard clearly saying "because you guys (parents) said we did this for a show." 'Nuf said.
So if the family "did this for a show", they sure caused a mess of trouble in our skies while playing their "lost kid in the balloon: game. This is from AP:
"The Colorado Army National Guard sent an OH-58 Kiowa helicopter and was preparing to send a Black Hawk UH-60 to try to rescue the boy, possibly by lowering someone to the balloon. Northbound departures at Denver International Airport were shut down as a precaution to prevent against a possible collision between the balloon and an airliner, said Lyle Burrington, an air traffic controller at the Federal Aviation Administration's radar center in Longmont, Colo. Air traffic controllers warned planes in the area about the balloon, Burrington said."
If this proves to be in fact a charade, the hundreds if not thousands of first responders on the ground, the ATC people, the FAA, NORAD, the airlines that had flights delayed, the media outlets that got punk'd...they're all going to line up to get a piece of this family:
Had the kid not said that in a national CNN interview, I'd have held off on playing the "hoax" card. But I've watched the video many times, and you cannot dispute that the kid definitely said he thought they were doing this for a "show." We have not heard the end of this story, and I suspect the family will be on every morning and afternoon talk show to tell their story. But unless they can come up with solid evidence that Falcon was wrong on this video and it was all a big mistake, I think the Heene family can kiss their book and movie deal goodbye.
Yes, I still am hopeful that this was a big mistake, and Falcon was not saying what we all think he was saying on that CNN video. But if it proves that indeed it was a planned stunt, I have a hunch the local and Federal authorities will not only fine this family into bankruptcy, but the parents could also be looking at jail time over any number of charges. You can view the father's response to Blitzer's follow-up question here and make up your own mind.

Yes, a very bizarro day indeed.

UPDATE @958A on 10.16.09: It's game over. MSNBC has footage of balloon boy's dad launching the balloon from their backyard yesterday. Clear evidence to dispute their story from yesterday. I'm thinking the cops might have, um, a few questions for this family.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Low and Slooooow:
What Future Air Travel Might Look Like, or Not

Admit it, we're all fascinated with blimps. From 1785 when Jean-Pierre Blanchard stuck flapping wings and a tail resembling a bird on a balloon and crossed the English Channel, we've been "pushing the envelope" on airships. [Oops, I see the Pun Police outside my window...]

People loved crossing the Pond hanging from the belly of the Hindenberg until 1937 when that craft met its toasty demise in Lakehurst, NJ. And of course, what discussion of blimps/airships would not be complete without a mention of Goodyear's large stable of blimps? They've been present in our skies over major sporting events as long as anyone reading this have been alive.

We fixed wing drivers like to poke fun at the blimp crowd once in a while, for reasons that are unclear. Maybe it's their shape, or their ill handling ways, or their less than stellar performance numbers. But on occasion a story pops into our world that again makes me wonder publicly if blimps - all right, airships – might not be a pretty decent way to carry humans to Grandma's house.

But before they can be considered as serious air transportation, they need to carry a LOT more people and go a LOT faster. Well, maybe that's not such a far out idea, so says this from YankoDesign, via Gizmodo:
"This whale-like entry into KLM Indonesia's aircraft design competition reminds me of the French "Manned Cloud" concept from a few years back. The WB-1010 would seat more than 1,500 people, and use a combination of super-jet, helium, and wind power. The concept's designer, Reindy Allendra, imagines the aircraft being constructed from material similar to the giant Airbus A380's GLARE composite: Glass-Reinforced Fiber Metal Laminate made of thin layers of metal and glass fiber. The WB-1010 would supplement its fuel use with the ability to harvest wind energy into electricity. An extractable robotic stand would also be used during the craft's vertical landings."
So this futuristic creation solves the "more passengers" issue, but what about forward speed? I searched a little tonight, and found out that even with pedal to metal, it's still going to take some time to get from A to B in a blimp. This is from modern-airships.info:
"On Monday the 27th October 2004, the [late] U.S. American adventurer Steve Fossett and his Co-Pilot Hans-Paul Stroehle set a new speed world record for airships. They were flying the 1000 meter course in both directions with an average speed of 111.8 km/hour [69.4 mph]."
So even by flying at world record speeds, it will take an airship about 40 hours in a no-wind situation to fly the LAX-JFK route. Respectable, sure it beats the crap out of Amtrak, but in today's short attention span world, will anyone find that many paying pax willing to camp out in a blimp for almost two full days to get across the country?

But, if the journey was the attraction, then of course this would be a very cool way to travel. Airships are known to be able to carry huge payloads, and if you pimp one just right, it could just be the coolest way to cruise in luxury. Again from Gizmodo:
"Strato Cruiser Airship, Floating Along Without Wings or Reality - The rich are different from you and me, so maybe they'll have time to ride in this Strato Cruiser Airship, sitting back and getting pedicures while this helium-lifted carbon fiber blimp lumbers along. The design concept calls for spectacular restaurants inside staffed by star chefs, a spa, private suites, office space, a swimming pool and even a resident DJ. If this all gets too boring for you, the designers also plan to install a bungee-jumping platform."
Now who among us wouldn't want to try out a little bungee jumping on the way to a business conference?

As we have discussed here before, how to work commercial airship fleets into our jammed airspace might be interesting. But nobody I know of is planning to launch scheduled airship service before the "next generation" of ATC comes online. By then, we hope there will be systems in place to allow high speed passenger jets and much slower piston singles to weave their way around some tricked out airships as they plod along.

And as a person who flat digs trains and thinks a great deal about someday taking a slow, scenic train ride across this great land of ours, maybe doing the same thing at 500 AGL in a blimp might be, oh, about a 1,000 times better.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Sunday, October 11, 2009

AOPA Summit - Bringing Every GA Pilot in the
Country Into the Conversation About GA's Future.

Every year as AOPA's Annual Convention approaches, I get a little nostalgic about what could have been had my career went down another path. These days, I am content in owning a healthy advertising agency that specializes in promoting aviation businesses, but had the stars lined up differently back in 1998, I might be typing this from Frederick, Maryland:
From the very first time I learned about AOPA, I knew I had to work for this fine organization. I attended my first "Expo" in Palm Springs and was blown away by the way everything seemed to be in its place, how everything was displayed, how together this group of aviators seemed to be. On that trip, I made an personal plan to head off to AOPA headquarters some day and sleep on their doorstep until they hired me to do anything. I'd park the cars (no, they do not really have valet parking), then maybe bus tables in the cafeteria. I'd use my gift of gab to talk my way into a job in the production office of AOPA Pilot, and soon they would notice my skill set - a combination of journalism, printing, photography, design all delivered with a large dose of honesty and high ethics. Over the years I would work my way up through AOPA's ranks to be in their management, and instead of being just a happy pilot attending their convention, I would be one of the movers/shakers putting the party on. I would do this because AOPA makes a big difference in every pilot's life, and it would be fantastic to be a part of that effort.
Of course, this plan never developed past the "great intentions" stage, and as I sit here 11 years later, I generally have no regrets. But as this year's AOPA convention comes together, I am again feeling like it would have been the best job in all of aviation to be on the team that leads GA into our future.

This year, AOPA's "Expo" has been re-branded as AOPA Aviation Summit and as a marketing person, I think this move is brilliant. There has never been a more contentious time in GA than right now, and changing the scope and focus of AOPA's convention is the right thing at the right time.

I asked Tom Haines – AOPA Pilot Editor and himself a GA pilot – about the rebranding of "Expo" to "Summit" and his response was quite informative:
"The decision to reposition the already successful AOPA Expo to AOPA Aviation Summit was [AOPA President] Craig Fuller's. The change represents his vision of how AOPA should play a key role in bringing together all affected parties--federal agencies, manufacturers, regulators, and, of course, pilots--to chart a successful course for general aviation. As the word "summit" implies, AOPA Summit will be a place where decision makers and influencers come together to discuss the future. Rather than position the show as the last event of the year, we would like it to be seen as the first event of the upcoming year--a place to look at the landscape ahead. The general sessions each day will focus on the future. Thursday kicks off with Craig interviewing leaders of each of the major aviation groups. I follow with interviews with several major airframe and engine manufacturers to get their vision of GA of the future. Friday Craig hosts a panel of authorities on NextGen while I talk to manufacturers about advanced avionics and flight control systems necessary for NextGen."
Of course, we all know that AOPA Summit - and the "Expos" that came before it - are as much about fun, camaraderie and education, and this year's event will not disappoint, says Haines:
"On Saturday of Summit, I [Haines] host a session with motivational speaker Jessica Cox. Jessica, who was born without arms, is a phenomenal person who, among every day challenges, learned to fly an LSA. She is highly inspirational and will lead us to a discussion with Remos about how LSAs can be a factor in changing the way nonpilots experience aviation for the first time--hopefully leading to a higher success rate among student pilots. Of course, it's not all about envisioning the future, it's about having fun and learning too--as the AOPA convention has always been. Rather than talking-head seminars, we will have dozens of forums where experts come together on panels to share their thoughts on everything from runway safety to buying an airplane. The exhibit hall will showcase hundreds of new products. At the center of the exhibit hall is the new "AOPA Live at Center Stage" television studio. There Craig, I, and several other editors will interview industry leaders. The interviews will be shown on large screens throughout the hall and later available on AOPA Online for download.

Out at the airport, the former "aircraft static display," is now AirportFest. Instead of just typical GA aircraft, it will also feature seaplanes, hot air balloons, military airplanes, classic and antique airplanes, warbirds, and more. Among the featured airplanes is the Lockheed Electra used in the filming of the movie "Amelia," which debuts a week before Summit. One area will feature a gathering of airplanes from 1939 and 1940, in celebration of AOPA's 70th anniversary this year. The social events will be more entertaining than ever, including a concert by recording artist John Oates (of Hall & Oates). John is a pilot who frequently uses GA for travel."
If there was ever a year to attend this wonderful AOPA annual event, this is the year. Summit is being held in Tampa November 5-7, and all the details can be found here.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, October 06, 2009

Some Pilots Rock Their Wings...
This Pilot Rocks the House

How many Certified Flight Instructors do you know that can say they've phoned their flight students to walk them through instrument ground lessons while doing a concert soundcheck with their rock band from the stage while on a national tour? If your answer is "none", well, that's all about to change.

A couple weeks ago, I was strolling down Broadway Avenue in downtown Eugene, Ore. during the annual Eugene Celebration. The street was the main focus of this eclectic, crazy and oh-so-Eugene party where we crown the annual Slug Queen, try to set a new record for saying please and thank you to strangers, and bounce between numerous stages listening to live music.

As I walked past one alleyway, I heard a blast from my past crashing between the buildings. I was lucky enough to have been at the very last Led Zeppelin concert in the U.S. July 24, 1977 at the Oakland Coliseum, so I knew the band was no longer around. I stopped to listen, and was spellbound as a near exact replica of "The Lemon Song" tantalized my eardrums. Like moth to flame, I was drawn down the alley:
At the "Library Stage" was this ridiculously cool band playing Led Zeppelin the way it was meant to be played. The band was Zepparella, an all-female band out of the S.F. Bay Area, and they were doing supreme justice to the music of Plant, Page, Bonham and Jones. The drum beat was crisp and pounding, the bass building a solid foundation. The lead singer was KILLING with a voice that was as soulful and aggressive as one needs to be in order to do Plant right. But what knocked me out was the lead guitarist, who was channeling Jimmy Page in her own style, one that was - to me - just as entertaining.
I came home and immediately bought the band's two live albums off of iTunes. I also wrote to thank them for the Eugene show, and in that conversation I found out that the lead guitar player, Gretchen Menn, happened to be a pilot. And not just a regular Ham 'N Egg GA stick like me, but a one-time professional pilot who flew RJ's for Continental Airlines.

This begged the question: How does a line pilot go from the flight deck of an airliner to blowing away audiences in her touring rock band? So I posed that and a few other questions to Menn, and what follows is her reply. I guarantee that if you stop reading right now, you'll miss the story of one of the most colorful aviators any of us will have "met" in a while.

World of Flying: Describe what prompted you get interested in flying, when you got your license, planes you have flown, additional ratings, and what you've done in your flying career.
Gretchen Menn: Starting flying was the result of a combination of caprice and a natural love of pulling G's. I have always adored roller-coasters, and am one of the rare people who actually thinks turbulence is kind of fun. My first year in college, the local airport put up flyers around campus offering discounts to students--$99 for three lessons. Incidentally, this happened to fall during the week that I had become obsessed with the Pink Floyd song, "Learning to Fly." It quickly became evident that flying was too expensive of a hobby for a college student, so I put it on the back burner, and just went up occasionally. When I graduated a year early with a degree in music, though, I started thinking about what my next step would be. I felt that I owed myself an additional year of education, and saw flying as a fun, challenging, and completely separate career from music. Moreover, a complementary career would shelter my passion for music from the necessity of making a living at it. I graduated from college, went directly to flight school, and within a year got my private, instrument, commercial, multi-engine ratings, CFI, CFII, and MEI, and started teaching right away. I flew primarily Cessnas (150, 152, 172, 172 RG), Pipers (Arrows and Archers), Beechcraft (Duchess and Travelair). After one year of instructing, I was hired by Continental Express to fly the ERJ (145 and 135). I flew for them for about a year, and left when I realized there was no way of making music the priority it needed to be, so I vacated the seat to someone who would truly appreciate it.

World of Flying: So my readers can make the connection between your music and flying, tell me what kind of flying you get to do now.
Gretchen Menn: After leaving the airlines, I went back to flight instructing part-time, but am now pretty much full-time music. Unfortunately, I rarely get up in the air now, though I keep renewing my CFI!

World of Flying: Tell me how you got involved with music, what age, what instruments.
Gretchen Menn: I took the requisite piano lessons when I was about five, studied flute for 3 years when I was in elementary school/middle school, and got into guitar in late high school. I started studying guitar my first year of college.

World of Flying: As your guitar skills were maturing, at what point did you realize you were good enough to go pro and make a living as a musician?
Gretchen Menn: I never thought about it that way. I just knew music was what I most loved and wanted to do, and that I'd do whatever was required to make it happen.

World of Flying: How did the idea of forming Zepparella come about?
Gretchen Menn: Clementine, the drummer of Zepparella, and I were in an AC/DC tribute band together. We wanted to play more shows that the other band members, and to take on new musical challenges. On the way to a gig one night, Clem and I were driving together, and she said she'd always wanted to do a Zeppelin tribute band. I said, "I'm in! Where do I sign up?"

World of Flying: I was a pretty big Led Zeppelin fan, and usually HATE tribute bands. But yours is not a tribute band, right? Just four women who rock and play their songs?
Gretchen Menn: Zepparella aims to pay tribute in a way that is more all-encompassing than the just the literal rendition of a Led Zeppelin show. It's like the concept of obeying the letter of the law versus the spirit--we strive to honor the spirit of Led Zeppelin as well as the music. So, that means I learn Jimmy's riffs and solos as note-for-note I can hear them, and I do study the details, but I don't mimic his moves on stage. We don't wear wigs. We do improvise when it's appropriate--not to improvise would ignore an enormous component of Zeppelin and what they were about. It's a balancing act between the letter and the spirit.

World of Flying: This is one question I have always wanted to ask a professional musician...when you have to fly commercial airlines to a gig, how to you ship/transport your equipment?
Gretchen Menn: Oh, I could really go off here. I have a major issue with how the airlines deal with musical equipment, and I've made many a phone call to tell different airlines that whichever airline would implement an instrument-friendly policy would have a stranglehold on musicians as customers. Even with crew tags on my guitar, I found my case horribly abused after one flight on my own airline! So, I make it a point to fly Southwest, as their 737s have plenty of room in the overheads for a guitar. I make it a point to be in the A boarding group, and to never, never be rude to a gate agent or flight attendant. They are the people who determine whether you get to carry on your precious instrument. I also have good cases in the event of the horror, the horror of having to check something, and insurance for the worst-case-scenario.

World of Flying: What is the demographic of your audiences? All fiftysomethings like me who remember Zeppelin, or younger people who might not have heard their music but love the way you play?
Gretchen Menn: The venues we usually play are 21 and over, but the all-ages shows we play on occasion have tons of younger people who are huge Zeppelin fans.

World of Flying: Back to flying. I am guessing you are an aviator at heart, we pilots all are. Do you miss the flight deck of a commercial airliner?
Gretchen Menn: An aviator at heart, yes, but not pining particularly for the flight deck. I am less attached to the equipment than to just getting to play in the air. Airline flying is, of necessity, pretty sterile, and I am probably cut out more for aerobatics. The ERJ was a pretty slick plane, though.

World of Flying: When you are on the road with the band, do you ever get to spend any quality time at smaller GA airports just hanging out? Do you ever rent aircraft in different parts of the country just for sightseeing?
Gretchen Menn: Not so far, though I have taught instrument ground lessons on the phone before soundcheck!

While not a musician myself (unless you count beating my Djembe drums into submission), I can promise anyone who loves Zeppelin's music one thing: If you go here and learn about Zepparella and watch their videos and then go seek out one of their shows, you will not be one tiny bit disappointed. And as a purely hetero male, I can also happily report that they are a real pleasure to watch perform. A rock band without a generous dose of sex appeal is, well, the Osmonds, and the ladies of Zepparella present a classy stage show with enough shaking, rattling, rolling and swiveling hips to satisfy their audiences.

And if you're at an outdoor concert venue some day listening to Zepparella and you see their lead guitar player staring up into the sky watching as a plane flies overhead towards the horizon, at least now you'll know the reason why.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Thursday, October 01, 2009

Take From the Rich and Give to the Deserving

The other night, one of my fellow Toastmaster members asked for input from me as research for a speech he was developing. His topic was "Community Service" and he asked me to describe the one big contribution to my "community" I have made.

I told him my "community" is the GA community, which spans the entire country, and without question, my biggest contribution has been the founding of the Welcome Sky Aviation Scholarship Program. The tale goes something like this:
In about 2003, I developed the Welcome Sky Aviation Scholarship Program at the flying club I belonged to back in Fresno, the Central Valley Aviation Association. It was my program 100%, and I developed it without modeling it after any existing program. It worked as if we had hired Robin Hood as our front man so we could accept cash donations from current pilots that were financially comfortable, and pool that money to pay for flight training for the best and brightest 18-24 year-old pilot wannabes we could find. The main idea was to generate new pilots to replace the old guys who would lose their FAA medical cards and have to stop flying.
In developing Welcome Sky, I wanted to find just the right kind of young people to join us to be "welcomed" into our sky. That exercise was exhilarating:
To determine who got the money, applicants submitted a minimum 1,200 word essay to a panel of judges that described how strong their desire was to learn to fly, and what they wanted to do with a flying career once they earned their pilot's license. I demanded they write this long essay because I feel that being a good writer is key to success in any endeavor, and anyone who never bothered to learn to write correctly was not the pilot candidate we wanted to give scholarship money to. What we got was unbelievable submissions from kids that were eloquent in their essays, and from these essays, we judges could easily see which candidates were real aviators, and which ones just liked planes because they were cool. The judges independently scored the essays, and a winner was chosen each time we had enough money raised to pay for a full-ride scholarship to pay for private pilot training, about $5,000 at the time.
One particular essay stands out in my mind. MaryPrue Fitzpatrick was one of our winners, and her story was just like every one of our own. Once the judges read her story, we all knew she HAD to be a winner:
One of her interests was sports, particularly softball. She attended a high school that was generally under the approach end to Fresno Chandler Downtown Airport's runway 30. She explained in her essay that while she was a pretty decent ball player, her coaches were always on her because as a fielder, she would lose herself in her dream to fly each time a GA plane slid by overhead on final approach to FCH. She said it was hard to concentrate on softball as she looked skyward staring at the plane, and each time this happened, she knew she had to learn to fly. This, my friends, proved she was one of us.
So how did Welcome Sky do? We had one full scholarship donated by Mazzei Flying Service at FAT, and we raised enough cash to train two other kids, so in all we produced three licensed private pilots. The program fizzled out after I escaped Fresno and headed to paradise where I currently reside, but by no means is Welcome Sky gone forever. The success we had with this program proved its worth, and I believe a similar program could be developed on a nationwide level to generate hundreds if not thousands of new, young pilots.

The only thing that stands in my way of taking this program national is time, which I have little extra of these days. But should I somehow retire one day – which I hope is sooner rather than later – you can just about bet I will resurrect the Welcome Sky Aviation Scholarship Program. With a help of teams of fund raisers and judges across the land, we could create a crop of fresh faces that will be aviation consumers for decades. That, my friends, would be a great thing, and I can personally guarantee that elation is a very weak word to describe the feeling we program organizers feel when one of these kids earns their private ticket.

So take this to the bank: Welcome Sky WILL return one day, all I have to do is retire first. But don't hold your breath on that happening tomorrow...not in this economy.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

What Toys "R" Not:
All I Wanted was a Simple Wooden Airplane

Recently, I became indoctrinated into the world of 21st century "toys" when I made a visit to the local big box toy store in search of a gift for my granddaughter's first birthday. Of course, my goal was to find a nice simple wooden airplane toy, hopefully painted with non-toxic paint, without any lead whatsoever, and possibly Made in America.

Yeah, right.

You see, the last time I looked at toys, I was about eight years old, and Tonka trucks ruled the day. O.K., Hot Wheels were pretty groovy too, and I'm guessing both of these product lines were made somewhere in the Heartland of this country by hard-working Union men and women who earned decent wages and had very nice health care and retirement plans.

Oh how times have changed:
As I walked along the endless aisles of the Big Box toy store, I quickly became aware of two things. (1) There were very few airplanes to be found, and (2) each and every "toy" was not a "toy" at all, but some sort of branded promotional item for a movie, TV show, boy band, or any number of hot fads fabricated out of some marketing department to sell stuff to brainwashed little people. Yes, there was "baby's first" everything, most of it made by a large company a guy named Walt founded way back when his "Land" was known for a Matterhorn ride instead of 1,001 "toys" branded with their logo.
One of the things that was a possibility on my list was a spaceship/airplane ride-on toy made by a venerable company from my past, Radio Flyer. Of course, the item looked great online, but was not available in stores. In fact, what was also missing in action was a good old fashioned Radio Flyer red wagon. That is blasphemy in Toyland. While I could not find a little red wagon, I could find some of the tackiest crap this side of a swap meet:
There was the two-foot-tall remote control dinosaur, which reared up on its hind legs and roared so loud, a child might actually injure him/herself as they escaped sure death in the jaws of this Chinese beast with glow-in-the-dark eyeballs. Gee, I wonder what fun materials were used to get that dramatic effect. Hope it wasn't spent nuclear waste painted neon green. Then there was everything Barbie, all boxed in hot pink packaging and all wearing very little doll clothing. I am not a prude, but is a crop top, hot pants, Go-Go boots and big boobs the look you want your little girl to strive for? Then there was the Fairy Princess lounge pillow, with gold lame' ribbing and a sorry excuse for a decal on the back showing three unidentified princess-type ladies...one of them might have been Snow White, not sure, no Dwarfs would be caught dead anywhere near this "toy" trainwreck.
We left Big Box Toy World very disgusted with the current crop of what the toy industry calls "toys". On every shelf down every aisle we saw promotional items being shoved down Junior's throat in the name of fun. I am not kidding when I say that over in one corner of the large store was one tiny shelf with "Wooden Toys", about 20 items, none of them with wings.

My step-son and daughter-in-law are adamant about never bringing their daughter any sort of Hannah Montana paraphernalia, or anything that sells our granddaughter a brand. No, they want her to be brought up in a world where she makes her own decisions about things without having to like Thomas the Tank Engine just because everything she owns has his face on it. Now that I have delved into the dark underbelly of today's "toy" industry, I fully see their point and if I somehow fathered a toddler today, I too would do everything in my power to make sure they are not brainwashed to HAVE to own everything Wally World sells with a princess on it.

The takeaway from this lesson is this: There are a great deal of very cool toymakers in this country that build high quality wooden toys, including this company that makes completely awesome wooden airplane toys in Wisconsin. And when you really think about it, doesn't it just make sense that really sweet airplane toys are made just a couple hours southeast of Oshkosh?

Makes sense to me. Sounds like I will have to place an order with these guys soon.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Sunday, September 27, 2009

Secret Airline Document
Exposes Profit Plan for 2010

This weekend as I taxied out on Eugene's north ramp, I couldn't help but to notice an Airbus A320 in JetBlue livery parked near the main terminal. It made my air traveler heart race as I wondered if somehow I missed the memo that JetBlue was starting service to/from my fair city. But a quick question to ground controllers confirmed it was the charter aircraft of the California Bears Pac-10 football team, in town to get their ass handed to them 42-3 by the University of Oregon Ducks.

What got me temporarily excited was the possibility of flying one of the few airlines left that doesn't gig their customers with so many additional fees and charges. So it got me wondering how any airline can survive today without these fees...and off to the Internets I jaunted in search of answers.

In an attempt to discover just how some airlines are planning to get back in the black for 2010, I came across a scheduled carrier you may have never heard of (because they really don't exist). While deep-diving in researchland, I uncovered a secret document from their CEO that spells out an ambitious plan for turning things around in the coming year:
From: [name redacted], CEO, MajorBux Airlines
To: Board of Directors

Ref: Profit Plan for 2010 - Additional Fees [CONFIDENTIAL]

Gentlemen:

As you well know, 2009 was a very bad year for the stockholders of MajorBux Airlines. We've seen passengers decline steadily as these pax are choosing Southwest and JetBlue, for some damned reason. But even though our focus groups have clearly determined that our passengers will run away if we impose more fees, I am the boss, and it's my way or the airway. Get it? Airway..not highway. Airline CEO humor.

So as of Jan. 1, 2010, our airline will impose the following new fees:

(1) Seat Fee: By removing all seats from the back half of the coach cabin, we will create a new section similar to United's "Economy Plus", only ours is called "Seating Plus". The fee to sit in one of these remaining "seats" is $49.95, and those flyers who do not wish to pay this new fee can stand in the back of the cabin. This new fee will generate $123 Million in revenue, a ridiculous pile of dough that is somewhat mitigated by the personal injury lawsuits that will surely come from those standing pax flailing about the cabin during periods of heavy turbulence.

(2) Oxygen Fee: O.K., has anyone on this Board ever actually SEEN those oxygen masks drop down? Our research contends that we could remove those masks across our fleet and save $45 million a year. Our new Oxygen fee of $34.95 per passenger offers those who want a "first class breathing experience" to opt for the new MajorBux Airlines P.O.D., or Personal Oxygen Device. With this device, a passenger can choose to breathe our special air imported from Aruba if the cabin de-pressurizes, or if their row neighbor is well, just stinky.

(3) Pets Fly Free Program: In order to counter the upstart Pet Airways, we are allowing any passengers to bring their pet with them on any flight, absolutely free. Fido or Fluffy will ride in a heated, pressurized section of our cargo hold and be fed gourmet pet food in a real silver-plated dish. And while the pet does fly free, the pet's carrier or cage will incur a $395 charge, one-way.

(4) Jet Bridge Access Fee: All of you on the MajorBux Airlines Board surely remember the good old days, when passengers boarded after walking across a hot ramp and climbing actual stairs leading up to the cabin. Today's travelers are spoiled brats, and DEMAND jet bridges, a costly addition to the boarding process. Our new Jet Bridge Access fee adds a mandatory $27 to any one-way flight, which will generate over $56 million for our bottom line.

(5) Food: Our marketing research has concluded that passengers will spend major dollars on in-flight food and snacks. Therefore, we are installing real pizza ovens into the galleys of every MajorBux Airlines MD-80, an addition that will fill the cabin with the enticing smell of poached pepperoni. We have instructed our ramp personnel to delay push back for two hours per flight, and after smelling freshly cooked pizza pie during this delay period, we anticipate a 90% purchase rate for our new line of airline pizzas, which will sell for $34.97 each and generate $34 million for MajorBux.

(6) Carry-on Bag Fee: We have determined that there is a gold mine in those overhead bins. In 2010, we will be the first airline to charge passengers $12.50 per carry-on, plus an additonal $49.95 for any roller bag gate checked on a Jet Bridge. Ingenious, yes, and profitable too!

I anticipate a record year for MajorBux Airlines in 2010 as we go far beyond where any airline has gone before in our attempt to further squeeze the flying public out of their money.
There you have it, a post on how at least one portion of the airline industry is poised to do far better in 2010 than they have done at any time since 2008. Of course, this post was complete horse crapola, my twisted way of ranting about how unsavory these airline fees are. It was prompted by Southwest's current ad campaign about how they do not charge for checked bags. You can download a PDF of all the Bigs fees here courtesy of smartertravel.com.

Man how I wish Southwest or JetBlue would start flying out of KEUG.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Venus and Mars: GWW's Meeks on Gender Differences on the Flight Deck

In part one of my interview with Girls With Wings founder Lynda Meeks, her own words proved my point that as far as GA's efforts to recruit females into our community, there is no better ambassador out there than Meeks, known in the Twittosphere as @GirlsWithWings.

Her answers in part one told the tale of why we need to grow the female pilot population, and how that starts with introducing young girls to flying. In part two below, Meeks gets into what a female might expect once they earn those wings.

World of Flying: Do you think there is any difference between male and female pilots?
Lynda Meeks: Definitely. I used to tell girls I present to that I had a secret for them: that girls make better pilots than boys because they have a better control touch. But I stopped doing that because I didn’t want them to think that is the only quality important in a pilot. There are technical and mechanical aspects to being a pilot that girls may shy away from, so in my interactive demonstration of “everything” a pilot knows to complete a flight, I show them that even these intimidating portions of our training can be successfully mastered if they are willing to break down the big concepts and learn them a bit at a time. Women also learn differently than men, so a woman may struggle more with a training subject as a man might explain it.

I have only twice received any type of flight training from another woman and just briefly. The last time this happened I asked a simulator instructor about a system in the Citation X I was struggling to understand. In two minutes she explained it to me in a way that allowed the “fog” to lift. Women like to fully comprehend a subject they are studying more than men do and will tend to get tangled up in the weeds. Most men are O.K. with not understanding things initially, figuring, eh, they’ll get it eventually. Many w have told me they fear falling behind their peers and are concerned with disappointing their instructors if they don’t immediately pick a subject up. But on the other hand women WILL work their heinies off to succeed when they put their minds to it.

Of course I’m generalizing, but I find the above to be true in most cases. Because of gender differences I insist on doing my Girls With Wings presentations to audiences of girls only. When the teacher doesn’t want to exclude the boys, I say that having both boys and girls in the group will inhibit the girls from fully participating. Boys are more aggressive and self-assured , and when in a group entirely of girls, girls feel more comfortable expressing themselves. It is not that I’m anti-boy, and most teachers do agree with this assessment. It reminds me of a time in flight school, in a class populated with all guys except for me (as it usually ends up - even now there is little chance of my being in a training class attended by another woman) when I bit my tongue to answer a question that I was sure I knew. The ground instructor kept asking what a part of the rotor system was called and my flight instructor had always insisted I named everything I touched on the preflight. Finally in frustration I yelled, “It’s a delta hinge!” My classmates were stunned. I hadn’t been known for speaking up in class for fear of being wrong and looking like “the stupid girl.” I’m still reluctant to speak up in my training classes because if I ask for clarification the male ground instructors (yes, they’ve always been male) spend the rest of the class helpfully (and embarrassingly) asking me if I am understanding everything.

World of Flying: As a professional charter pilot, do you ever run into males (or females) who are not comfortable having their jet flown by a woman?
Lynda Meeks: Thus far, no one has deplaned on me, thankfully, though I have heard of it happening. Whether my passengers just simply left their doubts unspoken, I have no idea. I have had quite a few times when people thought I was the flight attendant, but some get really excited when they find out I’m the pilot. As in, “I’ve never had a female pilot before!” I get a few people telling me its “cute” I’m a pilot, but after 16 years I feel like I should be seen as a professional, not as a novelty. As a captain on the airlines there were so many times when I’d be sitting up front filling up the paperwork and people would board the plane and wonder why I was sitting so far in front and not “attending” to the passengers. I had maintenance guys at the airline REFUSE to talk to me, and I remember one FO in particular that finally screamed at them, “Why are you talking to me? Go talk to her, she’s the captain!”

World of Flying: If there was one thing you could do to help add more females to the licensed pilot community, what would that be?
Lynda Meeks: Girls With Wings uses women in aviation as role models to inspire girls to achieve their full potential. We realize girls don’t all want to be pilots, and that’s fine, but we want them to know it’s an option. I have had more than one person say to me, “I didn’t know there was such a thing as a girl pilot,” which I find amazing. Many more say, “Yes, but are you a ‘real’ pilot?” I at least want to make sure many more people want to at least SEE a girl pilot and recognize her as such (I’ve even had female flight attendants hesitantly ask me if I’m a pilot while I’m in uniform!). Research has shown that we can tell girls that they can be anything that they want to be, but if we can’t show them examples of women succeeding, it negates the message. Plus, we need more positive role models for kids, and who better than aviation professionals, who need to show dedication, stay healthy, have a good driving/academic record, etc.? We even have a branch of Girls With Wings, called Mommies With Wings, since there’s very little information out there about being able to raise a family as a pilot.

Being a pilot is not only something a girl can aspire to, she can be very successful at it! Although Girls With Wings does not provide flights for girls, we do direct folks to seek out Young Eagles flights if they want to pursue this option further. We just need to get them in the cockpit. And we need to get more opportunities for girls to see younger, more women pilots. The average age of a student pilot is 43, and just like going to the airport with your dad to see other middle aged male pilots, this does not encourage their participation. Once they’re hooked on the idea of an aviation career or hobby, they can continue to visit the website and its message board, as well as follow the Girls With Wings Facebook Group or Twitter page for more encouragement.

World of Flying: How can pilots and aviation businesses help Girls With Wings and you in achieving your goals?
Lynda Meeks: When I started Girls With Wings I was told more than once that “there was no market for such an concept.” Not only have I proven them wrong, I have found that the encouragement for the GWW mission is much greater than I had ever imagined. Girls With Wings is growing by leaps and bounds and I do need the assistance of others to help GWW succeed. I can always use more role models and presenters to join the clubs that I am forming around the country to do presentations, We would appreciate sponsorship so that we can purchase the materials for the presentations as well as donations for our scholarship to fund flying lessons toward a PPL. I need more publicity to spread the word about what we’re doing, as well as assistance in the things I’m not experienced in, for example, website design and online games, PR and Marketing, merchandise research, legal advice, publication editing, administrative assistance, video recording, etc.; the list is endless really. Volunteers provide the framework for the success of Girls With Wings, and you don’t need to be a woman or a pilot to help. Anyone with skills and willingness to be a self-starting individual should get in touch with me at Lynda@GirlsWithWings.com. Thank you!

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Monday, September 21, 2009

Why Charlie?

I get an email once in a while that asks about my involvement in writing the screenplay for Three-Eight Charlie, the authorized life story of Jerrie Mock. For those new to this conversation, Jerrie was the first woman to fly solo around the world, making this fantastic journey in 1964 in a basically stock 1953 Cessna 180 named Charlie.

Since I have been producing a fair amount of new readers mostly due to Twitter, I thought it would be a great time to bring the World of Flying tweeples up to speed on a project that has been my passion since 2000. Here is the how the whole thing started:
I had been visiting the Fresno County Library since about age 10 when in 2000, I pulled a ratty copy of Three-Eight Charlie off the shelf of the aviation section. I had never heard of Jerrie Mock, but I seriously dig Skywagons, and this looked like a good hangar flying tale of one courageous woman's romp around our globe. Once into the book, I could not put it down, it was Mock's masterpiece, a tale of epic size and scope, with all the ups, downs pitfalls and triumphs you would expect that comes from a solo flight around this rock we live on.
Intrigued by the story, I read that Mock's plane, FAA N1538C, was in the collection of the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, DC. I had a planned trip there in 2000, so I made the National Air and Space Museum a required stop to visit Charlie. After you read Mock's book, you feel as if you had ridden jump seat with her, and you gain a great admiration for her trusty airplane, who comes to life in the book. And since this flight was such a major part of aviation history, I expected to see Charlie hanging right there next to Lindbergh's Spirit of St. Louis. Oh how wrong I was:
After searching from one end of the NASM to another, I could not find Charlie. I asked a clerk and found that Mock's plane was "in storage" at the Smithsonian's Paul Garber Restoration Facility in nearby Suitland, MD. I caught a train and bus out there, and slipped onto the tail end of the last tour of the day. In the last building on the tour, I stumbled across Charlie, stuffed back in a corner with his wings removed and resting between the gear. One tire was a little low, and the plane looked like it had seen better days. I was blown away. No, check that, I was pissed. And confused.
I stood there for a few minutes staring at one of aviation's most important historical artifacts, and could not understand how this woman could make such a big flight only to see her plane so far away from the public eye. None of this computed to me...I had to learn more...and I SWEAR the following happened:
As the rest of the tour wandered to the far side of the building housing Charlie, I stepped over the rope that separated the public from the artifacts. I walked slowly up to the side of Charlie, and soon found myself completely mesmerized. I stood in a trance, my fingers soon running softly across the large red "N" number on the side of the fuselage. To myself, I said "how the hell could this have happened, Charlie? What ARE you doing here?" As I stood there, I was overwhelmed with the feeling that in some otherworldy way, Charlie was communicating with me, and he was telling me to get him out of there. It literally gives me chills to even write this today, because I know what I felt that day, and it was an airplane pleading with it to help get his and his pilot's story told. And while I know you can't actually talk to a flying machine, I did that day, and promised Charlie I was going to do whatever I could to right this wrong. At this point the security guard showed up and politely ordered me to step away from the artifact.
From that day to today, I have been working to bring Charlie's and Jerrie's story to the masses. I met with Jerrie in 2004 and after convincing her I had her best interests at heart, I obtained the Life Story Rights from her and spent the next two years working with some professional editors and directors polishing the script to Three-Eight Charlie. I choose to write this as a feature film and not a documentary because I intend to someday get this movie made as a work of family entertainment that will introduce flying to a whole generation of young kids and their thirtysomething parents. The way to accomplish this goal is to see it in major release in theaters across the country.

For full disclosure, the Smithsonian's Dorothy Cochrane did help me out big time in this project. She explained that the NASM had just ran out of room, and that Charlie had a permanent home waiting when the new Steven Udvar-Hazy Center near Dulles Airport was complete. And the museum kept their word, as Charlie is indeed on display there for everyone to enjoy, and I cannot take credit for that. I will however take credit for raising awareness of the story, the airplane and the pilot.

Where does this project go from here? Traditional channels to get into Hollywood's inner circle have not yet paid off, and I am exploring other independent routes to get this film funded and produced. It might not be this year, no, this year a film is coming out about a woman who while colorful, did not make it around the world.

Someday, everyone will get to enjoy the story of the women who did make it around the world, solo. When that happens, when the public learns about Jerrie and Charlie, my quest will be complete. All that stands in the way is one giant "A" list actress to attach herself to the project, and about $20 million to bring Jerrie's world in 1964 back to life.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Sunday, September 20, 2009

Biased USA Today Article Proves Again
That Traditional Media Hasn't a Clue

This week's hatchet job on general aviation by USA Today again showed everyone in the GA community how misinformed the traditional media can be. This article goes far beyond the scope of "reporting" and is a classic case of a media outlet bowing at the feet of a large lobbying group. If you wish to read the industry response to this charade of an article, AOPA, NBAA and EAA have their replies now online.

Years ago when I was in the traditional media, we were taught to investigate both sides of an issue, track down reliable sources for each argument, verify the information those sources provided, and report a story as an unbiased third party. Any journalist who has been in this game for a while knows that what is left out of a story is as powerful as what is put in. And, by leaving out key facts that would have put into question the very nature of the article, a writer is as guilty as if they had made the whole thing up out of thin air.

First, let's look at what AOPA had to say about the piece:
“The story is completely devoid of journalistic balance that fails to acknowledge the millions of Americans who benefit from the nation's 5,200 general aviation airports every day,” said AOPA President Craig Fuller. AOPA’s media relations staff learned of the story a week before it was published and had a lengthy conversation with the USA Today reporter, but was not included in the article."
So the reporter had facts to dispute his own reporting, but CHOSE to omit them. Instead, USA Today's scribe wrote this:
"In the first full accounting of the 28-year-old Airport Improvement Program, USA TODAY found that Congress has directed $15 billion to general-aviation airports, which typically are tucked on country roads and industrial byways."
Wow, $15 billion is being squandered so that fatcat CEOs can land at ghost town little airports "tucked on country roads" far from metro areas. A decade ago, we might have been set back on our heels by a number like $15 billion, but in today's world, that is chump change you can find under the sofa cushion. Had the USA Today reporter been reading the Miami Herald, he would have found a far more egregious example of government waste to report:
"The [government agencies] have expanded criminal ''strike forces'' that existed under the Bush administration, most recently to Detroit, but also have committed about half a billion dollars to fraud prevention efforts this year. They are working on sharing suspicious billing information with Medicare -- an agency notorious for paying claims fast without verifying them -- to help stop fraud and waste. Experts estimate the huge entitlement program loses at least $60 billion to fraud every year, with Miami-Dade County at the center of the national crisis."
When we delve into the numbers quoted in the USA Today piece, it becomes to make the case that this story was designed solely to further an agenda:
The USA Today article said payments for improvements at GA airports are "the result of an obscure federal program that raises billions of dollars a year through taxes on every airplane ticket sold in the United States. The taxes can add up to 15% to the cost of a flight — or about $29 to a $200 round-trip ticket." But what was left out was that according to AOPA, the Airport Improvement Program or AIP is also funded by fuel taxes that we GA users pay. And in 2007, AOPA said FAA distributed $3.34 billion in airport improvement program funds to 2,610 airports. Of that amount, 389 airline airports divvied up $2,199,335,046 while 1,121 GA airports shared $831,717,227.
So how does USA Today's reporter get from $3.34 billion in 2007 to "Congress has directed $15 billion to general-aviation airports..."? You get there by omitting the fact that the $15 billion number quoted in the story was cumulative over several years - maybe as many as 28 - a key point carelessly not mentioned. How handy was that?

As soon as this story was published, USA Today completely alienated every reader they had in a sector that includes GA and related businesses, reported by AOPA to be at least 1.3 million workers. If they did have any advertisers that were GA related, by running this regrettable piece, they have assured this revenue to be gone forever. Poof. And, of the 600,000+ licensed aviators in the USA, it's guaranteed that I'm not the only one who will never pick up a copy of this rag ever again.

Finally, what is troubling to me as a big fan of the newspaper industry is this blatant disregard for editorial accuracy. Today, USA Today lost the aviation people, as if we were trash being kicked to the curb. Tomorrow, what sector of their readership will they lose because of yet another biased piece?

This all begs the big question: If this kind of fabrication orgy is the new standard in journalistic excellence at USA Today, how long will it take before they have alienated enough readers and advertisers to send their bean counters over the edge? Like the aviation industry they have now lost forever, when enough business sectors have had enough, a once mighty national news experiment will be reduced to...

www.usatoday.com.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Girls With Wings:
General Aviation's Secret to Growth

With only six percent of America's pilots being female, it is clear we in the GA community need to exert more effort to bring girls and young women into our world. With such disparity in pilot numbers between the genders, this under-representation of females on GA's flight decks is the one area that might well hold the key to the survival of GA as we know it.

When you consider that by doubling the number of female pilots, we could bring approximately 36,000 new GA customers to airframe makers, avionics sellers, and Fixed Base Operators. But to do this we first need to get these women into our flight schools and signed up to learn to fly. And to make that happen, we need an ambassador, someone to lead the movement that interests females to become intrigued with flight. And for those who follow the national "get girls to fly" effort, there clearly is no better ambassador than Lynda Meeks, known in the Twittosphere as @GirlsWithWings:
Meeks is a professional pilot that began her career in 1993 when she began flying Huey helicopters as a 2LT in the United States Army. She moved into the civilian ranks flying BE1900s for a US Airways Express carrier owned by Mesa Airlines. She's flown Citation IIs, Vs and the Beechjet for Flight Options before moving to her currently employer, NetJets, where she flies the Citation X. Meeks is living proof that females can excel in the modern aviation world.
Recently, Meeks was gracious enough to find a few minutes between charter flights to answer a few questions for this blog. This is part one of the interview, where she talks about how the idea of Girls With Wings came about, and what it takes to keep it going. In part two to follow soon, Meeks will talk in depth about aviation's gender issue, and offers some great advice for girls who would like to get their wings.

World of Flying: How did the idea of Girls With Wings come about?
Lynda Meeks: I didn’t grow up wanting to be a pilot, but I do have a sense of adventure. So it’s additionally odd that I wouldn’t have considered being a pilot while being encouraged in Army ROTC until it was presented as a challenge. I think that’s a result of the overly pervasive impression that has caused the world of aviation into becoming so male dominated. I completed my pilot training in 1993, so after about 10 years of me trying to find airplane stuff for my nieces that wasn’t as boyish as what I bought for my nephews, I started getting a bit frustrated. But then, my friend Cindy Jacobs, who I had flown with at the regional airline, became pregnant with her first child, a girl. I spent HOURS on the internet looking for something, ANYTHING, with an aviation theme as a gift for a baby girl. And there was nothing.

There’s a saying about if you find a deficiency, you can choose to fill it or choose to live with it. I decided to go out and buy an embroidery machine, with which I started creating t-shirts with airplane and helicopter appliqués. This was not a very successful business model because I ruined more t-shirts than I sold. But with every sale, I would get a story from someone who was either buying an item to encourage a future woman pilot, or was a woman who wanted to be a pilot but her dad, neighbor, teacher, etc., told her only men were pilots, or was a woman pilot anyway. Too many women pilots have and felt that there was too little support for women to undertake flight training;too many feel like they had been the first woman to get her license when really there are quite a few of us around and would have appreciated the encouragement of others. With the encouragement of Cindy Jacobs, and many others, the idea of Girls With Wings grew, to include not only pilots, but other women in aviation with the mission of encouraging more young girls to have an interest in aviation.

World of Flying: Why is it important that the entire GA community work to entice girls and women to learn to fly?
Lynda Meeks: The percentage of women pilots has not changed in nearly 100 years, but the percentage of student pilots that were women has been increasing. But that’s still only 12%, when women are 50% of the population. Aviation is still regarded as a male dominated occupation, when there is absolutely no reason that women can’t and shouldn’t be pilots. Additionally, I am in airports all the time and see very young girls get SO excited about flying and airplanes. But there’s a certain age where they may start to assume that airplanes are for boys if all they see are blue or red ones or military aircraft with olive green camouflage. Instead of trying to lure them back into a love for flying when they are older and considering an occupation, why don’t we maintain their interest as they grow? So yes, the Girls With Wings website is very pink (and purple) and girly. It took me several years in the military before I discovered I could be a soldier and still be a woman and now we let girls know they can be feminine flyers (or Air Traffic Controllers, or Airframe and Powerplant technicians, etc.).

World of Flying: Tell my readers briefly about some of the GWW programs.
Lynda Meeks: I’ve spoken of the website where there is a page of role models in different fields of aviation. You can click on each woman’s picture and read what they do and why they love it and even send an email to get more information. There are some games and coloring pages for the younger ones. There is a message board to help build community (which is slowly gaining in popularity!). I do the blog and extensive social networking as you know. The store is a way to promote the positive message of GWW which is that “Yes, Girls Can Fly!™” and that “It’s not how tall you are, it’s how high you fly.™” It’s also our fundraiser to provide for all of the stuff that we do. We do presentations at schools (referred to above) and I am forming clubs (slowly) around the country to train others to do the GWW branded presentation, and also to network in their community to promote flying and encourage other girls (or women) to get involved.

The scholarship, currently just at one $1000 scholarship per year, is to provide funds toward flight training to progress in her private pilot’s license. Applications are to be an essay, with photo, stating why the applicant believes she is a role model for Girl With Wings to include her motivation, inspirations and future plans. The Penelope Pilot Project features our character Penelope Pilot encouraging more young girls to have an interest in aviation by promoting their participation in various aviation events. There is an interactive calendar where people can post and seek out events to attend with their downloaded and colored image of Penelope. Then they can post pictures of themselves on the website, www.PenelopePilotProject.org and receive an email back that they can forward to friends and family showing them what they can do! It’s a great way to show girls that other girls are interested in aviation stuff too.

World of Flying: The work that goes into Girls With Wings must be enormous. How many people put in how many hours per day/week/month, and how has this work affected your personal and professional life?
Lynda Meeks: It nearly consumes me because ideas bounce around in my brain nearly 24/7. I’m working on giving up more control of the operation to others who have volunteered to help since the concept of GWW is being so well received I’m having trouble keeping up with it all! Volunteers are the backbone for the success of Girls With Wings, whether in personal, financial or administrative terms . Most of the assistance I receive now is on an ad hoc basis such as volunteers for airshows or presentations. Cindy Jacobs, referred to above, is working solely on getting our first book, about Penelope Pilot, illustrated and printed. The club members will definitely contribute more once they are organized. And, via the social networking, I have gotten connected to many men who support the GWW mission. They have offered much computer and technical assistance, I equate the time I spend on GWW to what I would spend if I had a family. It’s very rewarding and it keeps me away from the TV.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Sent to USA Today by NBAA

Here is the verbatim letter sent to the Editor of USA Today just minutes ago:

Editor - USA Today
7950 Jones Branch Drive
McLean, VA 22108-0605
letters@usatoday.com

To the Editor:

Your recent, one-sided story about small community airports ("Feds Keep Little Used Airports in Business," Sept. 17) lacks any sense of balance, and presents a gross misperception of the value of general aviation, public-use airports, federal funding of the air transportation system, and the needs of millions of Americans in communities nationwide.

These community airports serve a vital role for towns with little or no airline service by providing transportation lifelines for small to mid-size businesses, schools, universities and other organizations, and serving as regional development engines that generate jobs and economic activity. This "general aviation" activity - which refers to flights other than the airlines or the military - also helps fund the airports' operation.

Equally important, these facilities are essential for providing air transportation access for postal service, firefighting and disaster relief, medical evacuations, law enforcement, homeland security and military operations, patient and organ transport to emergency centers and other services.

In fact, Congress has long recognized that the upkeep of a national system of airports is an established national priority. It's unfortunate that your story ignored these key facts, and failed to explain the many good reasons why investments in community airports provide a tremendous return.

Ed Bolen
President and CEO
National Business Aviation Association


Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Tang, Check.
Space Suit, Check.
Waiver, Check.

We all know "space tourism" as it is often called is just around the corner. Spaceports are already being built, and private reusable spacecraft are well past the drawing board stage. It is now only matter of a short time before commercial space travel is an everyday occurrence.

But before you think about obtaining a license to blast paying humans spaceward for a quick orbit around the Sun, you must first apply with the FAA for such a license. So in the name of easing the burden for so many up and coming applicants all itching to launch Grandma through the stratosphere, anyone who wants to apply for a permit to do so must first fill out The FAA Commercial Space Transportation Human Space Flight Checklist.

The checklist, publicly obtained from the FAA here (pdf), pulls back the curtains on quite a few aspects of what we can expect the world of commercial space travel to be like. A scan of that document today revealed the following:
– The pilot or "remote operator" of the private space vehicle must "possess and carry an FAA pilot certification with an instrument rating", and "must train in procedures that direct the vehicle away from the public in the event the flight crew abandons the vehicle during the flight." There is, however no mention of what happens to the paying souls in back when the crew bails out. And just what is this "remote operator" anyway? Me, I want the pilot and his/her soul on board, there will be no kid with a joystick back on Earth playing a video game with my life.

– Each crew member with a "safety critical" role must "possess and carry an FAA second-class airmen medical certificate issued in accordance with 14 CFR part 67." And, each member of the crew must show their ability to "withstand the stresses of space flight, including acceleration or deceleration, microgravity and vibration."

– The space flight operator (not the crew) must "implement security requirements to prevent any space flight participant from jeopardizing the safety of the crew or the public. A space flight participant may not carry on board any explosives, firearms, knives or other weapons." There's no mention of whether you need to remove your shoes, empty your pockets and remove your laptop from its case. I'm sure the TSA is all over this one.
O.K., those all sound like pretty normal requirements that the FAA might throw at these new commercial space flight applicants. But once the lawyers got involved, it opened up the floodgates of legalese and gibberish to cover everyone's butts. A few lowlights, verbatim:
"Operator must inform in writing any individual serving as crew that the U.S. Government has not certified the launch vehicle and any reentry vehicle as safe for carrying flight crew of space flight participants. Before receiving compensation of making an agreement to fly a space flight participant, an operator must inform each space flight participant in writing about the risks of the launch and reentry including the safety record of the launch and reentry vehicle. This written disclosure must include, for each mission, each known hazard and risk that could result in a serious injury, death, disability, or total or partial loss of physical or mental function, and that there are hazards not yet known."
Whew. If that doesn't scare Granny and her money away, the requirements of section 460.45(c) sure will:
Operator must inform space flight participants of the safety record of all launch and reentry vehicles that have carried one or more persons on board, including both U.S. Government and private sector vehicles. This information must include the total number of people who have been on a suborbital space flight, and the total number of people of have died or been seriously injured on these flights, and total number of launches and re-entries conducted with people on board and number of catastrophic failures of these launches and re-entries."
When they get right down to those last few requirements, it ought to look on paper that the odds of burning up in a fireball during your space fun flight are pretty low. With the exception of a few horrible disasters that come readily to mind, according to Wikipedia, the exploration of space can be considered relatively safe:
As of 2007, in-flight accidents had killed 18 astronauts, training accidents had claimed 11 astronauts, and launchpad accidents had killed at least 70 ground personnel. About five percent of the people that have been launched have died doing so (because astronauts often launch more than once). As of November 2004, 439 individuals had flown on spaceflights: Russia/Soviet Union (96), USA (277), others (66). Twenty-two have died while in a spacecraft: three on Apollo 1, one on Soyuz 1, one on X-15-3, three on Soyuz 11, seven on Challenger, and seven on Columbia. By space program, 18 NASA astronauts (4.1%) and four Russian cosmonauts (0.9% of all the people launched) died while in a spacecraft.
Given all this, would I buy a ticket on a commercial space flight, if money were no consideration? No, not right away. But give the operators some time to build a good safety record, and then absolutely, I must certainly would haul ass to space soon after hitting a phat Powerball jackpot. Maybe I'll get to sit between Julia Roberts and Bill Gates as they try out the latest new thing in chic, trendy air travel.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Monday, September 14, 2009

Right Seat Proficient: A Very Good Idea

It was evident to my wife Julie way back when we first met that I liked airplanes. Maybe I wasn't as crazy about them as I am now, but even in 1987, I'm sure she could tell she was marrying a future pilot.

When it comes to wives, I often say I won the wife lottery with Julie Celeste. She is my friend, business partner, spiritual advisor, "go-to" person when my life gets off balance, the maker of the world's bestest lasagna, and of course, my flying partner. She was supportive of my quest to earn my private license in 1996, and throughout some years when extra money wasn't exactly plentiful, she always found a way to support my flying habit when I just HAD to go out and fly a rented Tomahawk for a few touch-and-goes.

She has faithfully sat in the right seat of two airplanes we have owned, the first being Peggy, the Skyhawk at Fresno Chandler Airport we acquired in a two-way partnership, and of course, Katy, our current Cherokee 235, the flagship of Dano Airlines.

Throughout many of my 350+ hours, Julie has never fussed about much of anything from her front row seat on our flight deck. She has gained the skill of listening to the radio well enough to pick our call sign out of the endless radio calls being barked by L.A. Center, and can read a chart well enough to let me know when I am mistakenly lined up with Marina Airport in California instead of my intended landing field, Monterey Peninsula Airport, just a few NM south.

But one thing has always nagged at her, and it was a very valid concern:
She has always asked me what we'd do here and there if the engine quit, or where my emergency landing strips were for some random portion of a flight. But the question always remained that if I should suddenly go off to fly with Lindbergh and Papa Louie in flight, how would she get the plane back on Earth and remain alive. As I am not a CFI, I could not ever get her to take step one towards learning how to control an airplane to a safe emergency landing...but I knew that lesson must be taught some day.
Well, that day finally came over this past weekend. Julie and I met my CFI, Jim Hunt, at EUG and we accomplished Julie's first "official" flight lesson. The results could not have been better:
After an hour sitting in Katy on the ground working with radios and developing a plan for harnessing my dead weight (pardon the pun) to the seat keeping me off the yoke, Jim grabbed the left seat and Julie took her co-pilot's position in the right. After the instructor flew us out to the practice area, Jim had Julie begin flying some graceful turns. Maybe it was her 45+ years as a ballet dancer, but when I say "graceful turns", I am not kidding. After some initial adjustments to Katy's interesting way of sometimes making the yokes appear in a left bank while in level flight or even a right bank (usually a fuel/weight offset or crosswind situation), Julie quickly figured things out and was soon driving 27W around the sky like a student pilot with five or more hours in the book. But she had only about 10 minutes...quite impressive from my vantage point in Katy's back seat, which was far more comfortable than I expected.
This was not an easy lesson Julie was given. Instead, I believe Jim had already determined as most people do that she is quite intelligent and not much gets past her. So he pushed her maybe a little harder than I think he pushes most primary students on their very first lesson. And her response was perfect:
After flying us towards Corvallis, OR with precision and with Jim acting as "ATC", Julie was able to spot the airport at a good distance away, and flew us right over the ramp at CVO. As we headed back to Eugene for landing, things got a little more interesting. Jim was squeezing into this first lesson everything but an ILS approach to minimums, and even had Julie pulling and adding power (using the digital tach as a guide) to maintain a sweet rate of descent. But without explaining that as a CFI he would have complete control of the plane on landing, there was a bit of misunderstanding as we headed towards runway 16R at EUG. The instructor had the plane fully in control, but the student didn't know he did, so she wasn't sure exactly what she was required to do. Flare? Stomp on the rudders? Power off, or power on? Even on rollout, Jim had the plane, but Julie found herself in a situation where she thought she was supposed to somehow determine how to slow us down as we blasted swiftly down the runway after a no-flaps, high speed arrival. This was the moment when panic could have set in for this first-time student pilot, but, it did not.
That's not to say her anxiety levels didn't rise dramatically. But in a situation when many student pilots would have been grabbing for the door handle, Julie stayed with it, didn't freak out [much], and never seriously lost her composure.

After everyone's heart rates came back down into the green, Jim had her taxi all the way around EUG's commercial ramp on a taxiway route that has even been confusing to me on occasion. With the prop stopped, I felt compelled to congratulate her on a first flight that was nothing less than fantastic. She is looking forward to a few more lessons so she can become comfortable with basic emergency procedures and feel good about her chance of survival should I become unable to safely complete a flight.

And I'm looking forward to having a more knowledgeable pax in the right seat who I believe will soon be working the GPS and radios like a First Officer. And that will make my flying that much more enjoyable, because as soulmates, we do everything together, and now we can add flying to that list.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Friday, September 11, 2009

10 for 10: With Unlimited Fundage,
it's Bizjets for Everyone!

For most of this year, GA and business aviation has been fighting to defend the incorrect perception that people flying on board private aircraft are overpaid, filthy rich, greedy CEO types. If you listen too long to the cable news channels or anyone in an Anchor's chair, you might come away with the notion that private aviators have a blatant disregard for the environment, our economy or Average Joe and Jane standing at the corner of "Walk" and "Don't Walk" in Mainstreet, USA.

Of course, we in the GA community know this is all bunk. But in our daily battle with the traditional media over this issue, we often assume that the person on the street might actually be starting to swallow this garbage. To find out just where we stand in this catfight to save GA's reputation, I hit the streets, so to speak:
I've been secretly carrying on an informal survey, asking random people I meet this question: "If you had Bill Gate's money, would you still fly coach or even first class via the scheduled commercial airlines, or would you fly in your own private business jet?"
I did not plan how I was to conduct this survey, and just carried it around in my head for the last few weeks. I tried not to hint that I was a pilot, but about 60 percent of the people who answered already knew this, which may or may not have tainted their answers.

As I present these findings, remember that this is about as unscientific as it can be. I didn't even get some of the names, as some of the "respondents" were basically complete strangers. So here is what I found:
There was the working stiff/blue collar guy working at the gas station in Syracuse, NY that simply said "hell yes" when asked if he would choose the bizjet. At a wedding I attended recently, three other people - all upward professionals from Detroit or the NYC area - all told me that without question they would dump the airlines in favor of private air transportation if they had unlimited cash.

Back home in environmentally-sensitive Eugene, I expected a different result, but did not get it. I polled four people at one of my weekly meetings or via email, and all would have chosen the bizjet, however one did say she'd buy carbon offsets with her pile of unlimited dough. [Of note is the fact that she could not with any degree of certainty tell me how much bizjets pollute, or if they were more or less fuel efficient than an airliner full of Grandmas.] And to close out this 10-person informal survey, I found two others here in Eugene, one who called travel by bizjets "extravagant" but added she'd relent and fly her jet if she had the choice. The last person I asked here initially said no, he would fly commercial to save fuel. But when asked if he would choose the Friendly Skies if his bizjet was powered by veggie fuel ginned from sorghum or algae, he instantly changed his tune and said he would happily choose the biofuel business jet.
There it is, 10 out of 10. I sure hope the traditional media types who keep floundering around with their "Automakers flew to WDC in their private jets to beg for a bailout" stories see this post and second-guess their decision to try and gain traction with such lame arguments. Uh. Huh. Like I really have that much sway.

Because [caution - cliché alert] at the end of the day, when given the chance, I believe the majority of Americans would choose private air travel if money was not an issue. But it is - more so than ever these days - so Mom and Pop will still have to gamble on the the hub-and-spoke system and hope they get where they wanted to go.

For the rest of us who have acquired a pilot's license and bought our own flying machines, we get to occasionally do it ourselves, beating the airlines at their own game. Not on all flights, and not in all weather, but on short hops in anything but the most severe convective wx, GA is the answer.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Monday, September 07, 2009

'Hangar Therapy' Beats the
Shrink's Couch Every Time

Anyone who is reading this that owns their own business knows the realities of this self-employment game. You are your own boss, which comes with a multitude of freedoms but also a large dose of additional responsibilities.

There are times when working for yourself is a cakewalk, you can sleep in if the work is not calling, or take the day off if workload permits. It takes a keen sense of self-motivation to be your own boss, because those times when you get to fly kites in the park on a Tuesday afternoon are extremely rare in this economy. In today's brutal business environment, the "norm" is to work 24/7/365 while doing your best imitation of those crazy Plate Spinner Dudes who used to show up on The Ed Sullivan Show when I was 10 years old. Today, "self-employed" means you work long, hard hours, weekends and double shifts if that's what the client needs you to do.

Recently, my ad agency has been on a tear. We rep a number of performing arts non-profits, and it seems they all needed a new website makeover yesterday. Timing is critical too, since they use these sites for online ticket sales, so putting them off is not an option. Fold a couple of business trips and an alleged vacation into the mix, and you can see I've been burning the candle in the middle AND on both ends.

This past Sunday, I had hit the wall. In an attempt to contain burnout, I did what any other pilot has to do occasionally, I headed out for some hangar therapy:
Ask any pilot with their own airplane housed at a hanger, and they will agree with me that sometimes, we just HAVE to go out to the hanger alone and just, well, hang. We aviators need to spend some quality time around the plane, just tinkering. Tighten a screw here, air up a tire there, sweep the floor, again. In the hanger, we can lose ourselves in aviation, becoming one with our flying machine. And when we do that, we can provide the necessary distraction to lower our stress level and change the channel in our heads from work and obligations, to flying.
For me, spending time at the hanger is about as good as it gets. I have been an airplane watcher and airport fence hanger for at least 43 years, so any time spent watching a 737 or Supercub takeoff and land is just golden. But at my current hangar, the GA world gets literally dipped in gold:
Katy's house is the last hangar on the westernmost end of a group hangar at EUG. It is maybe 10 generous spaces long, with no walls between the stalls. Each guy has their work bench, their stuff, none of which ever gets touched by anyone else...because we are pilots and trust each other. My end of this long space has a small office with a lockable door, so I get the use of this small shelved space to keep my "stuff". My end of the hangar faces EUG's rwy 34L/16R, aka, the field's commercial runway. I usually fire up the old Radio Shack scanner, crack a cold soda, open the doors, and just polish Katy – alone – with a keen eye aimed at the runway waiting to drool yet again on the next wonderful flying machine that drifts into or out of my home patch. In this environment, I am in heaven, just me, the airplane, and all that makes the GA community so great.
After a few hours rubbing a nice layer of Supercoat off Katy's Hershey bars, I am usually re-charged and ready to re-enter the Rat Race. I'll be good for a while, until workload and life collide, when I will again head over to Dr. Katy for some hangar therapy. You can have the $250/hour shrink and their couch, I'll take an hour at the hangar, making a 46-year-old bird gleam or sitting on a stool watching Skywest 6404 launch southbound for SFO.

Works every time.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Saturday, September 05, 2009

Look for the Veggie Van Coming Your Way Soon

As aviators, we burn one of two fuels, Jet A or 100LL AvGas. There is gobs of Jet A out there, but every so often we here the murmurs that the petroleum distillers would love to stop wasting their time ginning up a few tiny batches (by comparison) of 100LL for us GA piston drivers.

And each time I hear this, I wish to God we could get someone to make affordable, powerful turbodiesel aircraft engines that could run Jet A. There are a few out there such as the Deltahawk line of non-certified engines (with certified models in the works), and recently, Diamond Aircraft received an FAA Type Certificate for their proprietary Austro Engine AE300, which runs on jet fuel.

If the day ever comes when we can buy new GA airframes with turbodiesels or retrofit Cherokees and Skyhawks with same, then I believe those engines should also be certified to run on biodiesel fuel. I have always been a fan of biofuels, but after watching The Fuel Film – an excellent documentary that won the Audience Award for Best Documentary at the Sundance Film Festival – I am more convinced than ever that our country can ween itself off foreign oil if we just push forward with alternative fuels and sustainable energy sources.
I was turned on to the film by my step-son Scott Connolly, who is a talented film editor and videopgrapher working in the L.A. market. Scott is on the Fuel Film team, and is about to embark this week on a national press tour [the full press kit is here] with the films creator, Josh Tickell. Look for the Veggie Van and the Fuel Bus to stop in these cities leading up to the release of the movie FUEL:

9/8/09 – San Francisco, CA
9/9/09 – Sacramento, CA
9/10/09 – Cheyenne, WY
9/12/09 – Lincoln, NE
9/13/09 – Chicago, IL
9/14/09 – Detroit, MI
9/15/09 – Cleveland, OH
9/15/09 – Erie, PA
9/17/09 – Washington, D.C.
If you're like me and and am intrigued by the biofuel movement, go here and discover one of the best documentaries you will ever see. The film will be in wide release soon, and you owe it to yourself to seek it out and see it. From the Veggie Van to the Fuel bus to the history of this movement and film, it is a fantastic story.

And, after you read about The Fuel Film and want to help me, Scott and Team Fuel spread the word about this movie and this movement, go here and download the VVO (Veggie Van Organization) GREEN FLAG and use it as your Twitter and Facebook profile pic as I have. Add #greenflag to your posts about the environment, and when people ask you what the Green Flag is all about, send them here and get them on this bandwagon.

Your planet is already thanking you.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Friday, September 04, 2009

Not Enough Hours in the Day

This is just a quick note to my loyal readership to say that because of an accumulation of day job work, my blogging has taken a bit of a back seat. If you have come to World of Flying and are wondering why I'm not posting as much of my crapola du jour, please just bookmark the site and check back in a week or so. I'll be scaling back on more frequent posting until these two web sites I am building out are finished.

Until then, I suggest these two blogs as replacements. Max Trescott's blog is always worth a read, and Sara Keagle's The Flying Pinto blog is a very well-constructed web space written by a busy flight attendant/mother/blogger.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, September 01, 2009

Many Pilots Supporting One Voice for GA

I am at this moment cruising at FL 360 over Michigan in one of GoJet's sparkling brand new CRJ-700 ships serving as United Express 7405 from Syracuse into ORD. As we slip through the sky free of any of those nasty surly bonds, I marvel as I look down to see that each little 'berg along our route has a long sliver of tarmac or concrete at the edge of town with tiny specks of white dotting a large ramp area. The "tiny specks" are someone's Cessna, or Piper, or Cirrus, and they are parked in front of possibly a small shack serving as the bathroom/flight school/airplane gas stations we commonly refer to as FBOs.

As we plow westbound pushing air molecules out of the way, the crew up on the RJ's flight deck shares a common bond with the pilots, CFIs and flight students that inhabit those many little fields exactly 6.8 miles below seat 10D. They are part of the tight-knit community of GA souls that have earned or are earning the privilege to be able to legally fly in this country.

If we were able to touch this Bombardier down at any of the little airports slipping behind my RJ's wing, we'd be able to hear a harrowing tale of many threats that stand in the way of GA's continued free and happy existence. User fees, fuel restrictions, rising costs of training and aircraft acquisition, an economy left as rubble by eight years of cowboy politics – the list of threats to GA is long, and there are many resources on the 'Net to learn more. Among them are GA Serves America, an AOPA site that is a must read.
As aviators, it is critical that we all stand together to inform the public about the benefits of GA, while also helping the media to dispense accurate information that GA does not pose a security risk to America. We need to find one voice to make Average Joe and Jane understand that "business aviation" comes in many shapes and sizes, from the Super Cub hauling mail into the Idaho back country, to people like me flying Cherokees to visit clients, to firefighting aircraft trying to save Los Angeles from its firestorm du jour. And yes, GA is also the rich and famous flying G-Vs and Falcons to lunch on Bora Bora, but can you blame them, really? If you had their money, you KNOW you'd fly in that sort of private luxury.
When it comes to informing the public about GA, many of us talk the talk, but we never DO anything. There is, however, a pair of GA pilots out there who are organizing a huge flight across America in a STOL Cessna 150, to raise awareness about GA issues in a whole bunch of places along their route. On 6.10.10, Jason Schappert, a 1,500 hour Certified Flight Instructor from Florida and Vincent Lambercy, a Swiss private pilot now living near Frankfurt (Germany), will depart Daytona Beach, FL and head out on a massive and expensive 4,000 NM mission, one that every pilot in this country should try and support.

Schappert and Lambercy chose the Cessna 150 because they believe the Cessna 150 embodies general aviation. As they roll up to the TV cameras in these little and big towns in the 150, they will be trying to show the media and public that GA is not for just "the elite crowd", that it is something anyone can do regardless of income and that it's a wonderful family activity.

The idea for the flight blossomed on Twitter, and has gained national support on the flight's web site, flyingacrossamerica.com. Along the way, the two pilots will be looking to each local GA community to help coordinate media meet and greets, bring out local politicians to see GA up close, sponsor fuel purchases at the local FBO, and even provide a warm bed for the occasional RON (remain overnight). If you love the way this sounds, and want to get involved at your local level, your financial and personal support will help make a stop like this come to life:
After a couple of weeks of pilots making personal visits to TV newsrooms and the local paper inviting the media to the patch out at the edge of town, the camera crews and news reporters gather just before arrival time. The local TV anchor and anchorette have teased the event for a few days, and a couple of hundred people gather as well, joined by the Mayor and if they are lucky, maybe even a Congressman. The "Flying Across America" Cessna 150 lands and taxis up to the crowd and after shut down, two tired but happy GA pilots emerge from the cramped craft, smiling ear to ear. They spend the next hour "on camera" talking up how cool it is to be a licensed pilot, and how much GA benefits the entire country at many levels. They tell the media that the LifeFlight chopper that saved someone's bacon after that nasty head-on over by the Dairy Queen, yup...that was GA. The FedEx Caravan that brought your overnight package...you guessed it, GA again. They tell them everything we need them to hear, and after the TV guys get some footage of a young child sitting in the 150 wearing Lambercy's headset and grinning wide, the media can go back and report that GA is alive and kicking in this city and across America too. After a fuel stop and maybe a $100 burger, the Cessna departs again for the next little town circled on the chart, to land again, shake a few paws and talk up GA to anyone who will listen. They will do this again and again, all across these United States, until they reach Catalina Island off California's coast. At that time, they will have told our story to thousands of people at the airport and many thousands more at home watching the evening news or reading the local fishwrap. These are the EXACT people who need to know how wonderful and vital GA is to America.
If this sounds like a worthwhile effort, please help me and the blogging community to support Flying Across America any way you can. You can go to their web site and sponsor a few air miles, or contact the pilots to help coordinate a media event in your town if it's generally along their route of flight. But the REALLY cool thing one of you can do is bring to this effort serious corporate support, the kind of support that will allow these motivated pilots to take this mission to a much higher level. If you are a decision maker at any one of a large number of airframe makers, avionics suppliers or any other aviation-related corporation, I urge you to contact Jason or Vincent by clicking here today to offer as much financial support to Flying Across America as you can afford. Even if you are just a Hollywood star that uses GA to sneak into Aspen for a weekend of skiing, cut a check to this cause to say thanks for spreading the word.

I will be watching this flight closely and reporting as much as possible via this digital soapbox I call World of Flying. The planned route is Ocala - Daytona Beach - Destin - Baton-Rouge - Houston - Sweetwater - El Paso - Prescott - Santa Catalina. On the way home they'll fly Santa Maria - Las Vegas - Sedona - Roswell - Austin - Lafayette - Pensacola - Daytona Beach - Ocala. And it is truly too bad they are not coming anywhere near Eugene, Oregon, because I'd love to round up the local media here in Duck Country, USA and let them find out why my life revolves 24/7/365 around this fantastic thing we call General Aviation.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

Sunday, August 23, 2009

Glass Class: What it Takes to Teach Flight
in a Glass Cockpit Environment

In part one of this interview with Max Trescott, 2008 National CFI of the Year, we discovered his path to the right seat as a CFI. Now, in part two, we take a deeper look inside the head of this well-known CFI, to find out what life is really like as a person who teaches others how to fly.

World of Flying: What is the best and worst thing you like to teach to primary flight students?
Max Trescott: The best thing I like to teach primary students is risk management concepts. About 80% of the accidents are the result of pilot error, yet the Practical Test Standard (PTS) barely addresses risk management. Most tragic are the pilots—and I can think of two in my area in just the past two years—who embark on flights at night over the mountains soon after they get their Private certificates. In both cases there were no survivors. I don’t think either pilot had any idea of the high risk that he was taking on by making those flights.

It’s important that CFIs teach pilots how to evaluate their environment and make good decisions that will keep them alive. The sad fact is that many flight instructors just teach what’s required in the PTS to pass the checkride, which is the FAA’s MINIMUM standards for getting a pilot certificate. When they do, they’re doing their clients a terrible disservice.

The most challenging lesson to teach is the first day of landing practice. Those are the days on which I really earn my pay, since I’m trying to let pilots make mistakes and see the results of their actions without actually bending any metal.

World of Flying: Who makes the best primary flight students.
Max Trescott: The best students for any certificate are those who are motivated and want to learn. Learning is an active process that requires a lot of work by the client. If a student shows up and thinks that they can just sit back while I pour knowledge into their brain, there are greatly mistaken! I’ve had very few clients who didn’t show up motivated and willing to work. And the few who weren’t didn’t hang around very long.

World of Flying: In teaching the G1000 panel to a previous steam gauge driver, give me some examples of things that have to be unlearned, and describe some of the obstacles you must overcome to get them to understand glass.
Max Trescott: Interesting question. For all pilots, beginner or experienced, the toughest challenge is to get pilots to look outside the window! The computer displays (the PFD and MFD that sit in front of the pilot and copilot) are really attractive nuisances. Like my cat, they almost beg for attention! So it’s important to make pilots understand that they can’t spend most of their time looking at the displays.

Of course that runs counter to initially teaching pilots how to use the displays. Thus, I find the most effective way to transition pilots to the G1000 or Perspective is to get them to read part of my book or CD-ROM ahead of time. Or we can sit in the G1000 simulator or even the airplane itself while it’s still on the ground to explain the fundamentals. That way, they already know where to look for airspeed and altitude and aren’t hunting to find the instruments in flight.

World of Flying: Do you find a fresh zero time primary student has an easier time of learning to fly when they have all their training in a glass cockpit environment?
Max Trescott: I think the G1000 and other glass cockpit like the Avidyne Entegra and Perspective are the best learning environments, since pilots are learning both glass and traditional round gauges at the same time. It’s important for instructors in these planes to sometimes dim the displays and force student pilots to learn to fly and land the airplane using the round backup gauges. Every student pilot I’ve taught in a glass cockpit had no trouble landing the first time using just the round backup gauges. I’m also teaching pilots the fundamentals of the autopilot by the 3rd or 4th lesson. The autopilot greatly assists pilots with managing cockpit workload and ultimately frees up their mind so that they can make better decisions. It’s important that pilots learn that early in their career and not just think of the autopilot as something only airline pilots use.

World of Flying: Tell my readers a couple of hairy flight instructor stories. Have you ever had the crap scared out of you?
Max Trescott: I always tell pilots that the most important thing about learning to fly is to never scare their flight instructor . I’m kidding of course, but the reality is that I’m hard pressed to remember being scared by a client. I do remember being fairly relaxed one time while flying in a high performance plane with a licensed pilot. That changed very quickly when I heard the stall horn go off while we were still on a 1-mile final. Funny how just when you think you’re with an experienced pilot and can relax, something like that happens to remind you that flying is very unforgiving—especially if you don’t have enough airspeed!

World of Flying: Do you see a difference in flight instructors between the ones like yourself who are full-time teachers and those who are just earning time to get to the airlines?
Max Trescott: There are excellent CFIs in both of those categories. Of course you’ll always find a few instructors who either don’t have their heart in teaching or are unfamiliar with some of the aircraft in which teach. Frankly, I see very few of those CFIs in my area. But I hear frequent complaints from glass cockpit aircraft owners who travel some distance to fly with me because they have flown with CFIs who said they knew the equipment, but knew less than the owner. I’m a strong proponent of CFIs specializing in a few areas rather than trying to be a jack-of-all-trades. I often refer pilots to other CFIs who specialize in areas in which I am qualified to teach (e.g. tailwheel) but in which I’ve chosen not to specialize.

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share

A Teacher of Flight, a Student of Technology

Today I sat up near the Hillsboro, OR airport and tried to explain the NextGen of ATC to my step-son Micheal, himself a wannabe student pilot. Next to me – smiling and giggling as always – was his daughter and my first grandchild, Caitlin, all of 10 months old. We had flown in for a quick dinner visit in the Katyliner, which is far from what we know today as a "glass" aircraft.

I explained that by the time Caitlin is old enough to solo, the vast majority of the GA fleet will have glass cockpits, something that will be vital to the successful implementation of the next generation of air traffic control. I told Michael that today, it is critical for primary students (in my humble opinion) to learn glass right from day one, because that is the future of GA. And I told him that of all the CFIs I know, there was one in particular that excels at teaching glass.

At Airventure recently, I enjoyed some fast Italian food with Max Trescott, the 2008 National CFI of the Year. Max is about as nice a guy as you can find in GA, humble as myself but oozing with glass cockpit knowledge. He has mastered this glass realm with such zeal that he's built a book publishing empire based on teaching glass cockpit management to the masses. If you every need help in this area, the only stop you need to make is at his website.

Recently, Max provided World of Flying with a set of detailed answers about glass, being a CFI, technology and his cat. Part one of this interview follows, where we look at how this Silicon Valley high-timer ended up chasing airspeed with low-time flight students in California's Bay Area.

World of Flying: Tell me your background, how many hours, what ratings, type ratings, aircraft flown, when you got your license, all those details.
Max Trescott: I started flying when I was 15 years old. I didn’t have a driver’s license at the time, so my mother used to drive me to the airport, outside of Wellsboro, PA. I finished my Private when I was 19. In college, I received degrees in electrical engineering and Psychology. Then I went to work for Hewlett-Packard. I worked there for 25 years in a variety of Marketing, Sales and management positions. During that time, I continued to fly on weekends and earned my instrument, commercial, multi-engine and CFI ratings. I took my CFI checkride on September 10, 2001—and then was unable to exercise the privileges for 2 months due to 9/11. I taught flying on weekends and added my MEI and ATP certificate. After I left HP 5 years ago, I started a small business I’d been planning. But after two months I decided that I didn’t really like that industry, so aviation became a full-time career.

World of Flying: What was it that made you decide to become a flight instructor? Was there any one incident, or a lifelong dream?
Max Trescott: My decision to get my CFI rating was very serendipitous. At the beginning of the summer of 2001, Tim Johnson, a friend of mine who has since moved to Florida, said “Max I’m getting my CFI and you should too.” Since I’d just entered an uncharacteristically slow period at HP, I thought “What a good idea!” I’ve always looked for ways to raise my aviation game to higher levels and getting the CFI rating—which I’d never really considered before—seemed like a good way to do that. Thank you Tim!

World of Flying: Explain the details of the 2008 National CFI of the Year award, who gave it to you, what it meant to receive the award, and how (if any) the award changed your professional life.
Max Trescott: The General Aviation Awards program is sponsored by about 20 different GA companies and organizations. It’s designed to recognize CFIs, avionics technicians, A&Ps, and FAA FAASTeam safety counselors. The process starts with local FAA FSDOs. There are more than 60 of them and they’re encouraged to nominate candidates. Jack Hocker, the FAASTeam Safety Manager at the San Jose FSDO nominated me. Jack knew me well as I’d presented many Wings program safety seminars in the San Francisco Bay area. The candidates are then reviewed by the eight FAA regional headquarters, which select winners for each region. The FAA passes information about the regional winners to a committee composed of about 10 people, each from a different GA industry company or organization. They then select the national winners.

The award didn’t change my personal life—I still empty the cat’s litter box! Professionally, it gave me a platform for encouraging people to become CFIs and to recognize CFIs for the work they do. I think CFIs are the backbone of the aviation industry and rarely get the recognition they so richly deserve. I was proud to represent them for a year.

World of Flying: It is obvious you are a leader in glass cockpit instruction. What pushed you to focus your teaching in that area?
Max Trescott: Working in the high tech industry conditions employees to always be looking ahead to the next future innovation. So while I was initially skeptical about the value of glass cockpits in small planes, I tried to keep an open mind until I actually flew one. When I did, their value became very clear. While they are more expensive, they greatly enhance the overall flying experience and have the potential for increasing safety for properly trained pilots. I knew instantly I wanted to be associated with something like that.

World of Flying: Tell me what the future of avionics holds?
Max Trescott: I think we’re going to see more of a focus on usability. Right now, the systems are intuitively obvious if you happen to be one of the engineers who designed the system! But for most pilots, operating the systems is not intuitive and requires a lot of study. I’m sure more new features will be added in future systems, but the real breakthrough will come when the systems become easier to use. In the meantime, pilots continue to buy my books and CDs and hopefully that won’t change!

Like this post? Pass the word about World of Flying by clicking the "Share" button below to share this story on your favorite social networking sites or send friends an email right now!
Bookmark and Share